Posted on 03/30/2006 6:00:20 PM PST by NormsRevenge
I don't think so. We'll see. I hope George isn't losing it.
That is a promise I could never make with my wife. Of course, she knows I think the man is a traitor and a quisling so I fell that she would never ask for the impossible.
LOL ........ too much lunch.
;-)
Did he play the audio of a press conference?
Does McCain really think he can be president. What a joke. I would NEVER vote for him.
As the fat southern sheriff used to say, "Boy, you in a heap of trouble".
That's our nation, in a heap of trouble.
This is B.S. plain and simple..Mexico has no middle class...the rich in Mexico can buy anything they want from anywhere...and the Mexican "middle class" that was predicted to boom with the prior trading agreements is not developing. Mexico is a corrupt oligarchy that uses America as a pressure relief valve ( a dumping grounds for their peon class) enabling the ruling class to maintain their death grip on power and wealth. In the meantime the illegal population in the United States from Mexico continues to grow and grow...
"Balkanazation American style" is no longer around the corner , it's on the horizon.
Please tell us how you really feel about President Bush.
Too bad your spouse cut you off right when I was pointing out how ALL immigration is a NET BENEFIT to the United States of America: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1606095/posts?page=41#41
Reagan also trusted the Marines would be relatively safe from attack when they went into Beirut.
He got bit more than once on that trust thingy.
Yeah - a little over the top, don't you think? How many of these people against Bush actually voted for him, I wonder?
Perhaps the only thing worse than Bush's policies on immigration is his rhetoric. If you didn't know better, one would think some of the things he says are coming from a leftwing Democrat.
The best example is his coining of a new, nauseating platitude -- "family values don't stop at the Rio Grande."
He has also referred to illegal aliens as citizens.
He constantly speaks of 'jobs that Americans won't do', and never gives even the slightest voice to the possibility that immigration-driven wage suppression may have something to do with that.
And some of his recent comments really struck me. It was when he called for a civil debate on immigration reform, and then proceeded to define the parameters of such a debate like a liberal would do. He said that we should not question the impact of immigration on the economy, or worry about its impact on the national identity. So in one fell swoop, Bush declared debate over the economics of immigration -- which is very contested, with studies coming down both ways -- to be off limits! And while I know commenting on the effects of immigration on the national identity leave one open to hysterical charges of racism, the fact remains that our nation has no history of or experience with unending mass immigration. So I think it is very legitimate to wonder and worry about what this potentiall unending wave will do to the national fabric, but again, like a liberal, Bush declares such consideration to be beyond the pale for polite discussion.
It must be nice to engage in a debate set and constrained by one's own self-serving rules.
better for who?
Mark Levin read some context regarding Cesar Chavez tonight - about how in the 60s, he was angry that illegal immigration into California was preventing his UFW from improving wage and living conditions for agricultural workers there. even Chavez understood the negative effects on the socio-economic structure by having an unlimited supply of labor that will work for ever lower wages - while business owners pass the costs of sustaining those persons (health care, education, etc) to the taxpayers at large.
having illegal labor and guest workers isn't "capitalism" - its socialism, its socialism for businesses, who get to concentrate wealth for themselves while passing their costs to the general taxpayers, who are essentially subsidizing the low wages they pay.
Me neither.
Not much difference, really. One day we'll find represenatives who represent ot revolt.
When you are sold down the river by republicans you are apparently supposed to just shut up and take it!
I certainly knew what it meant. So .............does this then put G.W. firmly in the lousy deathwish, socialist camp of his 'one world order' father?
I hear you.
President Bush "And so I'd like to tell the American people we are a nation of law, but that doesn't preclude us from being a welcoming nation. I think a system which forces people underground and into the shadows of our society, which causes people to have to sneak across our border and risk their life, is a system that needs to be changed. "
OK, so we are the problem.. we cause people to sneak across the border. LOOK.. The system that is broke is the system in Mexico!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.