K was not successful while in the St. Leg. With his attitude he will be someones desert.
What it tells me, istead of supporting the top few GOP folks instead of pushing K as the only one, they are doing the work of the democrats. Maybe that is the idea.
If any district has a chance of electing a conservative, it would probably be the 50th with its majority of Republicans.
Logic would dictate supporting the frontrunner.
I can't bring myself to think anyone but the Dems are trying to divide the R votes on purpose.
same old tired crap , no conservative is ever good enough for some folks, and so it goes,, as the state and nation go down the toilet.
It's always conservatives and conservative candidates fault, amazing.. the tune never changes here.
Really? From what I know, he was highly respected and effective.
Please cite some specific examples to support your contention, with sources.
(or is this unsupported smear just part of the Bilbray campaign?)
So, you'll be throwing your support to Roach or Kaloogian then?
(I wouldn't vote for Roach if he was the last guy on earth, personally)
SurveyUSA, 03/28/2006
45% Busby (D) 14% Roach (R) 12% Kaloogian (R) 10% Bilbray (R) 5% Morrow (R) 5% Uke (R) 6% Other 3% Undecided
That's a nice meaningless throw-away line. How do you define successful and not successful for a member of the Legislature? If Howard wasn't successful, tell me who was, and what made them successful in your book.
I worked with Howard while he was there as Assembly Republican support staff. Howard was always one of the die hard conservative warriors, and always at the forefront of the prolife movement.