To: Fred
""It demonstrates that there's a reserve army of unpaid researchers ready to mobilize at a moment's notice,""
Does anybody else detect a slight difference in the New York Times attitude when the person being checked out is a Republican rather than, for example, a CBS anchorman?
3 posted on
03/29/2006 10:41:31 PM PST by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
To: gondramB
6 posted on
03/29/2006 10:44:26 PM PST by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: gondramB
Slight difference? The writer was practically wetting himself/herself with glee.
Having said that, the mistake should have never been made.
What happened to the CBS anchorman should have been a wakeup call for anyone tempted to try and pull a fast one.
8 posted on
03/29/2006 10:46:29 PM PST by
Ronin
To: gondramB
Does anybody else detect a slight difference in the New York Times attitude when the person being checked out is a Republican rather than, for example, a CBS anchorman?Well, the New York Times has such a sterling reputation for fact-checking, honesty, objectivity, and integrity, that
Haaack (cough)
Sorry, I can't go on with a straight face - - I'm laughing so hard I'm spitting.
To: gondramB
Big difference. And it's always the conservative they go after.
They (Kos) are also virtually silent on issues of two of the more liberal (R) candidates.
A miscaptioned photo? Big deal!
Go Howard!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson