Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Immigration Advice to the GOP
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | March 30, 2006 | Dick Morris

Posted on 03/29/2006 4:27:02 PM PST by thoughtomator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last
To: CowboyJay
Invade Mexico? It has already begun.

Look at the US retirees moving in there. Did you know that the Mexican govt allows US citizens to keep US dollars in Mexican banks. Not to mention that the mexican banks are partially owned by US Banks.

As my compadre Luis Delgado was lamenting the other day, the damn gringos are going to own everything in Mexico.

101 posted on 03/29/2006 7:16:08 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: inquest

You confuse psychic with knowing human nature.


102 posted on 03/29/2006 7:18:31 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
"If someone gets paid 5 dollars, he has done at least 5 dollars worth of value or else no one would pay him." We're paying much more as a country than that $5.00 per hour. We're currently paying out $2,700/yr in entitlement costs for every illegal alien in the state of Colorado (this does not include secondary costs such as education for anchor-babies, or unpaid medical bills). The estimates I've seen is that these payments would nearly triple once the GW program is put in place.

We also highly subsidize some of the industries that employ the most illegals.

Cheap labor? Only for the CRIMINALS who directly employ them. They're bleeding the rest of us taxpaying, law-abiding citizens dry. We have a glut of uneducated and unskilled labor in this country, not a shortage. That's why wages are going down below legal minimums.

103 posted on 03/29/2006 7:19:53 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Unless the program is so large that any mexican that wanted to come could come easily with a very short wait then there would still be many trying to jump the border. How many mexicans would be satisfied with 3-6 years of high pay work? It seems to me that a fence is the only thing that could make anything short of a totally unlimited (number and time limit) guest worker program possible. Then again I think we're being led towards integration and in that context I can see why a fence would be counterproductive.
104 posted on 03/29/2006 7:21:37 PM PST by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
"When you work, you create value. If someone gets paid 5 dollars, he has done at least 5 dollars worth of value or else no one would pay him."

The point of my previous post is that we're likely subsidizing that supposed $5 of value created to the point of a net loss. At best, it's a very poor ROI, and we'd be better served by extending further tax cuts to private citizens to stimulate consumer demand, or building infrastructure and R&D capability with that money.

We're importing social problems and poverty. The effect of this policy has already played itself out in Europe. We have empirical data to suggest that it serves no purpose for developed nations to continue importing unskilled and uneducated workers.

105 posted on 03/29/2006 7:27:24 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mthom

Your logic is based on the misconception that employers want to hire illegals. If an employer can get a legal worker, he has no need for the illegal.


106 posted on 03/29/2006 7:28:29 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Well said!


107 posted on 03/29/2006 7:28:55 PM PST by Pelham (Treason: Not just for Democrats anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Wrong. They've invaded us. Not vice-versa.

I probably should have used the more descriptive 'regime change' in my previous post.


108 posted on 03/29/2006 7:30:20 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
65% of legal latino's in CA voted for Prop 187 to stop funding illegals.

Don't you know you're supposed to blame the GOP's failure in California since 1994 on Prop 187? Didn't you get the memo?

109 posted on 03/29/2006 7:31:17 PM PST by Pelham (Treason: Not just for Democrats anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay
You can spin however you want to.

The illegals are allowed to live in this country with a defacto legal status and they are allowed to work in this country. That is not an invasion.

110 posted on 03/29/2006 7:34:47 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
"The worker to retiree ratio is 3 to 1. It will fall further when the boomers retire. Spin that." Not spin, bub. That will make the taxpayers even worse off as we will be not only supporting the retirees, but also the underclass which consumes far more in entitlements than it pays back. If we were concerned about supporting the boomers when they retire, we'd be smuggling in doctors, engineers, skilled-machinists and the like. Amnesty is a double-whammy, not a solution.
111 posted on 03/29/2006 7:37:56 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: inquest

The RNC's heavy support for squishy moderates in California primaries couldn't possibly be the problem out here. No, it has to be the one-issue nativist xenophobe conservatives that are the problem. The fact that a lot of latinos are among the knuckle-draggers fed up with Open Borders is of no consequence. We MUST reward the Undocumented Workers in order to curry favor with... with... you know.... the lawbreaking element that we need in order to win elections. Yeah, that's the ticket.


112 posted on 03/29/2006 7:38:14 PM PST by Pelham (Treason: Not just for Democrats anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay

I hope you and your wife don't mind supporting me.


113 posted on 03/29/2006 7:40:04 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
"Your logic is based on the misconception that employers want to hire illegals."

No. My logic is based on the correct assertion that any given company will want to pay as close to $0 as possible for labor. That is why we had to outlaw slavery and indentured servitude in this country.

If a company wanted to hire a legal citizen, we have plenty available. Your logic is based upon the lie that there is a shortage of available labor. There is not.

Much of Bushie's 'guest-worker' plan is lifted from policies in place in the UAE and Saudi Arabia. No thank you to slavery or purposely importing impoverished slums.

114 posted on 03/29/2006 7:47:12 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay
Your assertion is contradicted by the fact that agribusiness has agreed to a $2/hour rise in the prevailing wage on the H2A guest worker visa.

Spin that Mr. Knownothing.

115 posted on 03/29/2006 7:55:14 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Will the Republican need to appease its anti-immigration base similarly vitiate President Bush's efforts to appeal to Hispanic voters?

This is bias, plain and simple. Why is it not an appeal to anti-ILLEGAL immigration folks vs. appeasing radical Hispanic groups? Oh well, consider the source, I guess.

116 posted on 03/29/2006 7:57:32 PM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay
Do you have a credible source or link showing the relationship of the Bush Plan to UAE?

If you weould take the time to read the bills, you would see that the Bush Plan is a compromise between Kyl-Cornyn and McCain-Kennedy.

117 posted on 03/29/2006 8:02:42 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Yes to the fence - It should be the first priority

Yes to guest workers - We need to make illegal immigration more difficult and legal immigration easier.

Yes to greater criminalization - They are lawbreakers!


http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html


118 posted on 03/29/2006 8:06:32 PM PST by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Everyone suffers from illegal immigration, but Pete Wilson's support of Prop 187 doomed California to a decade of dominance by the Democrats, which is 10 times worse.

Who did he doom himself with?

The white liberals.?

There are very large Hispanic populations in Kern, Tulare, Fresno, Stanislaus, Merced and San Jaoquin counties yet they all seem to vote Red and conservative.

There are overall few Hispanics in the north coast counties and they seem to always vote blue and liberal.

Rural area Hispanics vote conservative?

Urban area Hispanics vote liberal?

Wonder why that is? I say rhetorically.

119 posted on 03/29/2006 8:09:35 PM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A message

and correction; meant to say.

Those counties seem to vote red and conservative. ( In place of they all.)


120 posted on 03/29/2006 8:11:39 PM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson