Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SDGOP

LOL, sure, Rush is so unbiased. Limbaugh can't debate liberals who come on his own show effectively so why would I think he could recognize a good debate himself? Sorry, I watched the Boxer-Allen debate. Did you?? I saw the WHOLE thing, not the 2 lines Limbaugh choose to play me. Why don't you learn to think for yourself instead of letting a guy on the radio tell you what to think??

I have no need to "lie" about Allen's performance. I have nothing against him personally and frankly I would love to support him because I'm probably much more in line with him philosophically than any of the other potential GOP candidates. But I know what I see in Allen and it's not pretty. The guy is an empty suit. I have no need to invent that. I wish he were a marketable, viable candidate for the presidency but he's not. And I'm not going to go into the coma of denial about that just because he has co-opted the mantle of Reagan for himself. You can go ahead and feel safe in your delusions about Allen but I really doubt you have paid much attention to his utterly gruesome performances against Democrats in various TV appearances.

And I'm not a McCain humper as you so vulgarly put it. But I believe he is the only one who can beat Hillary besides Guiliani. But hey, go on being a Dimbulb humper and vote for Howdy Doody Allen! You'll be the first one to bitch about how terrible a Hillary presidency is.


58 posted on 03/29/2006 2:31:28 PM PST by MikeA (Not voting in November because you're pouting is a vote for Democratic Congressional control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: MikeA
But I believe he is the only one who can beat Hillary besides Guiliani.

If Rudy gets the nomination, I'm staying home and not voting.

And I know alot of conservatives won't be either.

Whats the point of voting for Rudy if he agrees with Hillary Clinton on every single social issue?

That said, Hillary Clinton couldn't beat hubcap in a presidential election. As long as the GOP puts up someone with a pulse, she's toast.

I will never understand why anyone thinks she can actually win a national election?

66 posted on 03/29/2006 3:22:15 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
LOL, sure, Rush is so unbiased. Limbaugh can't debate liberals who come on his own show effectively so why would I think he could recognize a good debate himself?

If you think that then nobody must be any good at debate. Typical of mccain supporters, attack everybody who you expect to support you and then demand they hold their nose and support you. Rush has been one of the greatest advocates for conservatism and for you to attack him like that on this forum shows how much of an idiot you really are.

Last time i remembered you got pretty belligerent on a thread regarding Allen insulting everyone and acting like a complete child. You continually lie about Allen's performance and i did watch that debate and i thought he was fantastic as did many other people. the more times you say Allen cannot debate, or Allen is a dunce the more of an idiot you show yourself to be.

And Allen proposes to do what to cut Medicare and SS spending?? Sorry, but Allen has not proven himself to be anything other than talk. Where is his leadership on spending? Where is his calling both Republicans and Democrats alike on drunken sailor spending and demanding an end to pork??? Easy. It doesn't exist! Allen is just playing it safe to not ruffle any feathers for the GOP nomination. That tells me he wouldn't take any bold stands or show any out-front leadership as president in cutting spending either.
I may not like all of what McCain stands for, but at least he's not afraid to kick a little ass in our party on pork spending. It's more moxy than I see from Bland Allen.

Allen has been pushing for the line item veto and is the principal sponsor of it, as well as the principal sponsor of legislation to keep the internet tax free, as well as voting against the bridge to nowhere. He has plenty of examples and does what he can, but hes only one Senator. If mccain is so powerful, how come he cant ever stop pork? All mccain ever does is 'talk' about it and never proposes any legitimate legislation becuase he doesnt want to ruffle his friends feathers. Coburn is the one who lead the charge on earmark and mccain just attached himself and let coburn do the dirty work.

Your guy is all talk, anti first amendment, pro global warming, anti tax cut, pro amnesty and you try to defend it by calling his principal opposition a dunce. Your no better than a democrat, hell you probably are one.

You'll be the first one to bitch about how terrible a Hillary presidency is.

I would much rather have Hillary than Mccain becuase Hillary = gridlock, mccain = a bunch of bs legislation like campaign finance, and global warming, and amnesty. I am sorry, but i, and many other freepers will NEVER vote for a guy who doesnt take the first amendment seriously. Try and defend that.

97 posted on 03/29/2006 10:40:54 PM PST by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: MikeA
And I'm not a McCain humper as you so vulgarly put it. But I believe he is the only one who can beat Hillary besides Guiliani.

Do you really believe this? IF Hitlery gets the nomination and there's no guarantee of that, she will not win one single red state.I think even Tancredo could beat her.The only way she wins is if conservatives stay home in droves, Mcpain could make this happen.

183 posted on 04/05/2006 6:01:55 AM PDT by edchambers (Neocon foot-soldier of the Haliburton death squad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson