Posted on 03/29/2006 9:32:17 AM PST by vrwc0915
An American Indian Speaks Out Against Illegal Aliens
Dr. David A. Yeagley, an American Indian and direct descendant of the Comanche warrior Bad Eagle says it best:
America today is making the same mistake we Indians made nearly four centuries ago. America is letting in too many foreigners. And we Indians could end up losing this country all over again. It may come as surprise to many white people who have been brainwashed by the media to see Indians as the ultimate liberals, but there are few groups in America today who take a dimmer view of mass immigration than the American Indian.
The Comanches were one of the most intolerant of all Indian peoples. We had no use for anyone else, white, Mexican or Indian. When we came thundering down on the southwest plains, we took the land we wanted and ran everyone else off. We created the life we wanted, at the expense of other people. The white man did the same. Only he did it on a grander scale.
In many ways, Indians see the white man as a kind of adopted son -- naive, reckless and destructive, at times -- but nevertheless cut from the same warrior cloth as we were. We do not see black, Mexicans, Asians, Arabs and others in this light. These peoples may have their own virtues and traditions, but they have no history with us. They are strangers. If they want to rule us, they must conquer us the way the white man did -- on the battlefield, by force of arms. That is the only honorable way for a warrior.
The white man seems to have lost his spirit. We see that he is giving this country away to [illegal alien] others, and this fills our hearts with fear. For we are part of the land he is giving away . . . The white man must regain his warrior soul and take back his land! In that fight, I will stand by his side and offer whatever strength I have to ensure his victory!" (13)
Interesting find. I wonder why the left hates him so? I'd never heard of him until this. Hmmm.
The more pressure we keep on Mexico, immigration-wise, the more reformers
inside of Mexico can be emboldened and empowered to scale back monopolists'
abuses down there which keep our own country flooded with economic refugees.
Here's an interesting new thread on new legal reform progress that finally
emerged in Mexico I think as a result of immigration reform's failure:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1611677/posts
We can make a difference for our sake, and their's as well. Isn't it the
neighborly thing to do?
"Are you seriously saying that the NAU( is the term the globalists like to use) is a good thing?
It's not necessarily a bad thing, if it's run correctly. It will need to grow slowly, and develop properly to be a good thing, but that is possible... Maybe after the Ebola outbreak... /not certain if I'm being sarcastic or not.
Historically speaking, Mexican Indians never had control over our Southwest. Only our own Native American Indians did.
What was called "Mexico" in 1846 was not the product of conquest by Mexican Indians but, rather, the product of conquest by Spanish Europeans.
If the Mexican Indians talking about Atzlan have any ancestral rights to any land, those lands are to be found in Mexico and not in the Southwestern U.S.
Well, he may have a point. I don't trust a word I've ever posted here. Conservative Indians can't possibly exist.
I think that's just about the problem with most tribes I've encountered. My own, Choctaws, are pretty much the same when it comes to political affiliation. I don't get it either. My family, friends and acquaintances are all conservative in thought and action. They align in no way with the democrat platform, yet they'll vote democrat in a hearbeat because they don't pay attention other than what snippets they hear in the MSM or DNC press releases. In other words, they're regular Americans, who've bought the lie that the dems are the party of the "working man".
As for the tribal leaders themselves, they've corrupted themselves with money and power like every other politician out there. The Choctaw Nation is looking a little bit better lately though. I now live near the Eastern Band of Cherokees. They seem to be doing better too. Both appear to be trying to foist off the chains of the federal government.
Actually, the Mexican population is: 60% Mestizo , 30% Indian, 9% white 9%, 1% other
What you posted about him comes from a GOSSIP COLUMN.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NatNews/message/38979
I haven't found any other source backing up the allegations.
Ranald "Bad Hand" MacKenzie put the whup on 'em. Kicked the p*ss out of Kickapoos in Mexico raiding over the border from Mexico, too. He went in after them, WITHOUT the permission of the sovereign nation of Mexico, which did nothing about them. MacKenzie almost singlehandedly broke the Comanche, Kiowa and the remnants of the Southern Cheyenne on the Staked Plains. Did well up north against the Northern Cheyenne and Lakota in the fall/winter of '76-'77, too.
Your numbers are much better and seem to be taken from the CIA fact book for Mexico. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/mx.html I suspect the "whiter" Mexicans tend to immigrate here legally. All I know is these days we don't just get the mixed blood Mestizos (Indian-Spanish/European) coming here illegally. We get Mexican Indians jamming in here who speak no Spanish. They speak Mayan or other tongues
Not that it will make you feel any better but there are plenty of people of every race and culture who are just dying to be wards of a communist state. Little do they know that that's when the real dying will begin.
"The devil you know is better than the devil you don't know."
Good point.
" plenty of people of every race and culture who are just dying to be wards of a communist state. Little do they know that that's when the real dying will begin."
One drink is too many and a million drinks are not enough.
Something like 17 of the major 19 civilizations in recorded history failed from the inside. Their citizens got lazy and stupid...then collapsed.
Are we next ?
Yes, the Chickasaw, Choctaw, Cherokee, Creek and Seminole. "My people" were *merchant warriors* with English surnames who traveled on steamboats on the Trail of Tears.
Aren't we supposed to ask for "reparations"?
"But if you want to hear real anger, talk to the tribal members here in California who have to put up with Azteca and Mecha wackos telling the local tribal people that they're on Mexican land."
Hoooooeyyyy!
I'd like to be a fly on the wall to hear one of THOSE conversations go down.....
You all don't still drive Cadillacs till they run out of gas then leave them on the spot and go get a new one? That's what I always heard! *grin*
"Now as I turn life a page,
To the land of the great Osage ...
I feel like in those hills where I belong.
Way down yonder on the Indian Nation ...
Ride my pony on the reservation ...
In the Oklahoma Hills where I was(n't) born."
I've always liked Dr. Yeagley, but IMO it's a big mistake for him to cast the issue in racist terms like this.
Actually I think he's casting it in racial terms not racist terms. He's obviously not PC and I highly commend him for that alone.
Wrong question.
The right question is,
The fact that the overwhelming majority of the American people do not want to lose sovereignty to the NAU, is merely an interesting, but quaintly misinformed opinion to those whom we have elected to represent us, from GW on down. They clearly and certainly wish to bring it about, despite the wishes of their constituencies.
The Republicans have done a very bad thing. In regard to illegal immigration, they have allowed the Democrats to appear to be more in tune with the wishes of the Republicans' normal constituencies. Of course, this does not mean that erstwhile Republicans will flock to the Democrats' standard. IMHO, it means enough of them might stay home in 2006 to cost us Congress, and then in 2008, the White House.
Of course, as soon as the Demos are in, the flood gates will be open to their new illegal voters. But since when have American voters been smart enough to look down the road at the consequences of their actions? I seem to recall a sleazeball from Arkansas who became president because many a stupid Republican voted for a malevolent dwarf, instead of a wimp who just happened to be pretty damn good incumbent.
It's bit much for the stupid party to hope that the voters will be smart enough to make up for their lunacy.
Defend against all EFAD
I would look forward to fighting alongside my red brothers for this nation.
Lord knows, they've fought well in all of America's overseas wars!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.