Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

Like I said, you use a common Holocaust denier trick.

You and the Holocaust denier deny objective facts (like no prosecutions of routine hirers of illegals, no meaningful border enforcement, the insistence that border security can only be part of a guest worker program instead of being a fundamental part of his job, all those dead Jews) because you are both interested in perpetrating lies. You insist that reality exists only on official documents, which is frankly psychotic.

It is a total waste of time trying to 'prove' to a Holocaust denier that the Holocaust actually happenned. And it is a total waste of time trying to 'prove' to you objective facts.


1,989 posted on 03/30/2006 4:34:27 PM PST by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1788 | View Replies ]


To: Sam the Sham

A loser of arguments always try to revert back to historical extremes to make the final case for their claim. I guess you're admitting you don't have documentation making it "Bush's Policy" to tell the law enforcement community to ignore the law as you claim?


1,990 posted on 03/30/2006 4:44:34 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1989 | View Replies ]

To: Sam the Sham; Coop
That was THE worst analogy I have EVER seen on FR.
1,993 posted on 03/30/2006 5:02:21 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1989 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson