Replies

"Why should I dispute with facts, when facts are ignored? The point is, your mind is made up, no facts will sway you (or the abb crowd, aka, lib infiltrators) one way or the other. At least with me, I'll read information, and make my own decisions based upon facts, and yes, I'll change my mind based on facts. So far, I don't think Bush is a traitor or should be impeached, and I'll vote for the republican party again (even though I'm not a republican). I don't do knee jerk."

Yeah, right.

Nowhere did I say anything about "abb", or call President Bush a traitor or call for his impeachment. While I think he is way wrong on this particular issue and a couple of others, overall I support him and think he is one of the best of the politicians in Washington.

I'm smart enough to realize that without him as President this country would be in much worse shape than it is.

I don't ignore facts; I have opinion based on direct observation of my little microcosm, and when other peoples reasonably presented 'facts' conflict with what I observe, I make quite an effort to reconcile those differences into something approaching reality.

I literally spend more time attempting to learn facts by watching the news and reading FR, lucianne.com and several other news sites and blogs trying to gain worldwide perspective than anything else I do.

Yet your only reply to all of my year and a half registration and 940+ contributions to the public discourse in this forum was: "Another noob chimes in."

If that isn't knee jerk' (and a totally lame comeback) I don't know what is.