[Ben Mugged]

The most primal of instincts is procreation. It follows that the most averse reaction is towards anything that would tend to eradicate the ability to procreate. Homosexuals cannot procreate and therefore are an evolutionary branch to be avoided. Society instinctively avoids them. Where is the fault in this logic?

[Dutch Boy]

"Homosexuals cannot procreate and therefore are an evolutionary branch to be avoided."

Homosexuals sometimes do procreate. I personally know several. Other than that I agree with you. Homosexuality has the net effect of ending the genetic passing of a family line. This may be a natural way of removing a series of traits that are developing an unnatural path.

[Windsong]

I agree with you. On a related note, is racism "natural"? Is it "normal"? Various species of both ant and ape congregate only (okay, usually) with those of the same species. Tigers with tigers, lions with lions, wolves with wolves, etc. The Japanese are considered to be racist in many respects. So are Africans, Inuit, Cherokee Indians, etc. Not that they hate others, but just that they feel more comfortable with their own "kind" (as Moses put in in describing the animals of the ark).

Also interetsing that Christ said the greatest commandment was to "Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself". No mention of different races at all. Also, the Jew (saved) vs. Gentile (unsaved) in the OT (which is of course reversed now--the saved are the followers of the Christ).

[thehumanlynx]

PPING