I never said it was. It was a geocentrist making a statement on a forum. It was NOT the opinion of the forum, as you stated.
You also have to be able to understand what those who appear to disagree are really saying and exactly where they are disagreeing, in totality or in just a narrow way.
I understand EXACTLY what they are saying.
You made an assertion that the forum I pointed you to "admitted" that 'surface-to-orbit' calculations were 'earth-based' only. I invite everone to go to that link and read the discussion. You will find Dan is lying through his teeth.
If you will look, there was a member of the forum who agreed with the geocentrist's statement.
If that does not meet your requirements, then OK.