Yup, moving the goal posts. Your dishonesty is again noted.
I am not the one who moved the goalposts, you are. And you did so very disingeniously, I must admit. I didn't even realize it the first few interations of this discussion, but I do now so the point will continue to be made.
You then, must make a positive statement that 'surface-to-orbit' intercepts are calculated using a heliocentric model in contrast to the links I posted showing that the orbital position of the sun is not part of those calculations.
Otherwise, my position that orbital calculations are made using a geocentric assumption stands, regardless of the relative motion red-herring that you insist on introducing to the discussion.
Your next move is also obvious to me. Please proceed, if you know.