Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Celtjew Libertarian

"... the white man was willing to stand and told the bus driver that he had no problems doing so."

Under the Montgomery city ordinance, the standing white man was *required* to take the seat that Parks was asked to vacate, when ordered to do so by the bus driver. This same ordinance also *required* the bus driver to demand that Parks vacate her seat. So, the racist ordinance had the potential to make the white passenger a criminal, for a simple act of courtesy to a (black) woman *or* to make the bus driver a criminal for not making Parks move and the white passenger take her seat.


13 posted on 03/28/2006 11:43:13 AM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: riverdawg
Under the Montgomery city ordinance, the standing white man was *required* to take the seat that Parks was asked to vacate, when ordered to do so by the bus driver. This same ordinance also *required* the bus driver to demand that Parks vacate her seat. So, the racist ordinance had the potential to make the white passenger a criminal, for a simple act of courtesy to a (black) woman *or* to make the bus driver a criminal for not making Parks move and the white passenger take her seat.

If you ever want to have some fun, read both Thomas Sowell (articles and some speeches on the same topic) about who the first folks were to fight against the segregations laws, how they were imposed and how the political campaigns in favor on them were slanted.

Almost every single lesson of it applies today and all the same tactics are used across the board today on various policies.

19 posted on 03/28/2006 1:13:58 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson