Ya think?
Posted on 03/28/2006 3:29:06 AM PST by Man50D
AntiChrist=Islam
Correction: WWIV...and it's already started.
The total absense of any moderate leadership in the muslim world is a real problem. And a growing one. Indeed any leadership whatsoever other than crazed incitement to rage.
IMO Bush should make a speech to the entire muslim world from time to time.
Just heard Senator Bill Frist say it on NBC.
Well if we do unite with at least what is left of the powerful western nations, (France is a goner, rest of mainland Europe currently neutralized), lets not telegraph our moves to them. No more UN sanctions. No more counting moon phases. No more media coverage of the battles. If we hit Iran, it must come as a complete surprise.
Wasn't there something aobut a 'blue turbaned leader' from the middle east who led the world into war from which it never recovered in Nostradamus?
"Both China and Russia have been aiding Iran's nuclear program, which Tehran claims is intended for peaceful purposes only. Russia last month received a delegation of Hamas leaders, and pledged to maintain diplomatic relations with the terror group in spite of efforts by the U.S. and Israel to isolate the newly elected Hamas-led Palestinian government."
PUTIN OF RUSSIA AND HU OF CHINA CANNOT BE TRUSTED, PERIOD. BUSH'S NEW STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP WITH INDIA IS DESIGNED TO COUNTER BOTH OF THEIR DEVIOUS AMBITIONS. VIVA BUSH!
I agree, the only thing left is the "official" declarations.
People, countries and factions have been blatantly picking sides for the last couple years.
We are already in WW IV. WW III was won.
People, countries and factions have been blatantly picking sides for the last couple years.
Just check any system admins security logs and it becomes clearer and clearer who is on what side.
Ya think?
The simple facts are that there were way too many of them. They have foolishly demonstrated the problem. But that is the left for you, a ship of fools.
"The total absense of any moderate leadership in the muslim world is a real problem."
The King of Jordan seems pretty sensible on most topics.....
Near impossible in this day and age waaay to many Sats in orbit to try and hide from when masking large scale troop movements.
The Leavenworth Documents show that Saddam did not like him at all. Could not understand why he sided with the west on so many issues.
While Nosty refers to the middle east and Libya in a few of his prophetic verses, nothing is ever specific enough to point to a recognizable coming event..
Actually, it is even unclear whether MALUS is the actual anti-christ, or is the final precursor to the anti-christ..
As for whether MALUS or the anti-christ actually comes out of the middle east, far east, or even America, is left unclear, vague, and confusing..
That "Blue Turban" guy comes out of a wildly inaccurate TV documentary hosted / narrated by one of those Star Trek TNG guys.. ( one of the 10 worst Nostradamus documentaries ever done.. )
Let me finish by explaining why...
Nostradamus was actually unconcerned with world events and their future outcome..
His only true concern in making his prophecies was...
France..
Yeah, all those prophecies are made in relation with France, and the future of France, how it will affect France, will France approve, etc...
Likewise, the few actual times, ( day, month, year ) that Nosty uses are questionable as well..
The adoption of the Gregorian calendar was made about this time, and depending on which calendric system he used, there may be a variation of several years between his date for a prophecy and ours..
So take it all with a grain of salt, and anything you hear about the prophecies of Nostradamus should be appreciated for it's entertainment value only..
what happened to ww3?
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.