Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Senate needs not only to pass this measure but enforce it along with the rest of the immigration laws which have long been completely ignored.
1 posted on 03/27/2006 7:28:23 AM PST by Daytyn71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Daytyn71

Don't we need the criminalization bill, and the guest worker program? Certainly not the carrot without the stick.


2 posted on 03/27/2006 7:30:14 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

As long as Congress is willing to put up with an executive that freely ignores the law, passing more laws will do nothing at all. Congress must confront the executive, until that happens this is all a dog-and-pony show.


3 posted on 03/27/2006 7:31:08 AM PST by thoughtomator (Pacifism is objectively pro-terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

The media was playing up the "huge" numbers of marchers, but what they seemed to not grasp was that, considering that there are something like 11 Million illegal aliens in the US, it's surprising the numbers weren't larger. And, how much weight should we put on illegals protesting in our streets suggesting that breaking laws are fine. Will the courts accept that were I to rob a bank?


4 posted on 03/27/2006 7:36:07 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71
As usual, the left wins the propaganda war.

Where are the right-wing activists? I thought they were all up in arms?

At their keyboards, calling congress, busy planning the defeat of Republicans?

Yawn.
5 posted on 03/27/2006 7:36:23 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

The do-nothing but whine democrats are doing everything they can to undermine efforts to protect America from terrorists.


6 posted on 03/27/2006 7:41:55 AM PST by tkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

GWB just killed his poll numbers. Definitely below 40 after today. Problem is he may drag down the GOP in the 2006 Congressional elections.


7 posted on 03/27/2006 7:42:05 AM PST by Fee (`+Great powers never let minor allies dictate who, where and when they must fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

From David Frum of National Review:

NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD MEN ...
My forebodings of a year ago seem to be taking on my reality every day: Immigration truly is emerging as an issue that can shatter the Republican party. The president is determined to thrust upon the party an amnesty/guestworker approach that is opposed by the overwhelming majority of the Republican rank-and-file. He has come to believe - and tells visitors to the White House - that party opposition to him is based on irrational fear, ignorance, and prejudice. (Just like Dubai! Or for that matter, Harriet Miers.)

If anything were calculated to solidify the perception that this administration scorns the values and concerns of the ordinary Republican - if anything were designed to discourage ordinary Republican from turning out in November 2006 - it is what this administration is doing now. At a moment when the president needs his maximum strength to see his foreign policy through to success, he is gambling everything on a wager he cannot win. His version of immigration reform can only pass Congress with Democratic votes, and there is zero possibiilty that the Democrats will help him - but every likelihood that they will egg him on to incite a Republican civil war on the issue that most bitterly divides the president's party.


8 posted on 03/27/2006 7:51:12 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HiJinx; gubamyster
Thanks to our greedy Quislings, we're going to wind up in a civil war.

All for dirt-cheap illegal alien wages---what a cost!


10 posted on 03/27/2006 8:05:58 AM PST by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

The mass rallies for illegal alien "rights" tell us one thing, there are too many here. We need to catch them and quickly deport them.

Tell your senator you support the House's Sensenbrenner immigration bill.


11 posted on 03/27/2006 8:07:15 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

"We will not accept enforcement-only approaches," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy group."

Its obvious who ownes this country. LaRaza (as in The Hispanic Race - as in "for our race everything for others nothing") has given the weak kneed RINOs a command.

Bush and the RINOs are nothing more than democrats - working to further divide this country and put the American people in harms way.


13 posted on 03/27/2006 8:11:26 AM PST by sasafras ("Licentiousness destroyes order, and when chaos ensues, the yearning for order will destroy freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

Wouldn't Mexico's economy improve if its govt. stopped being so anti-foreigner? Here's a potentially astonishing related thread which details how FLAGRANTLY anti-gringo Mexico's immigration laws are compared to our own:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1602610/posts

Can you believe it? Why doesn't the media cover this information (yet)? That would set the race-baiters still in their tracks! Couldn't we stop the amnesty juggernaut if we figured out how to expose how racist MEXICO's own immigration laws are, maybe through a massive letters to the editor campaign and calls to talk show hosts and our politicians?


18 posted on 03/27/2006 9:01:21 AM PST by Shuttle Shucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

CNN has ran one propaganda piece after another on immigration all weekend and today.

All the enforcement stuff with an amnesty is window dressing. It happened in 1986, and the laws weren't enforced. It won't be any different this time around. Ask yourself, what good is more penalties on companies that hire illegals when the federal government does near nothing now involving said companies?


19 posted on 03/27/2006 9:06:51 AM PST by NapkinUser (Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
20 posted on 03/27/2006 10:27:42 AM PST by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71; stainlessbanner
"The House-passed measures would make being an undocumented immigrant a felony and erect a 700-mile fence along the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border."

So even the House is still simply providing lip service to the problem. Sometimes I wonder why we pay taxes to the feds at all. Then I think of all the Andres Serranos and Karen Finleys out there who would be starving if our government representatives actually represented our wishes, and I can't help but feel that my suspicions why the government doesn't care what people think are easily substantiated by one simple fact, a fact that forever meant that the consent of the governed wasn't all that important to the United States.

The North won.

21 posted on 03/27/2006 2:33:50 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...


LaRaza Demands Ping!

23 posted on 03/27/2006 2:47:30 PM PST by HiJinx (~ www.proudpatriots.org ~ Serving Those Who Serve Us ~ Operation Easter/Passover ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
"We will not accept enforcement-only approaches," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy group.

They are making demands. Meanwhile Bush and congress are cowering to their demands. Pathetic, just pathetic.

29 posted on 03/27/2006 9:58:25 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Daytyn71

I saw Ms. Munoz on C-Span today. She basically stated that La Raza will be pushing for worker's rights too, i.e. higher wages, etc. When the wages are increased then there WILL be competition for these "jobs that Americans won't do". I don't think that the business community that is pushing for amnesty realizes that this is actually going to hurt them in the long run. And further, the "guest workers" will still be sending their earnings home to Mexico along with their worker's comp benefits, SS disability benefits, etc.


41 posted on 03/28/2006 2:23:22 PM PST by toomanygrasshoppers ("In technical terminology, he's a loon")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson