^^^^^^^^^^^“Well, I think it's outrageous. I mean, Laura Ingraham should come to Iraq and not be talking about what journalists are doing from the comfort of her studio in the United States, the comfort and the safety.”^^^^^^^^
She did! Whoops!
The arrogance of these people, I think they are finally realizing the pandora's box that they opened is taking it's toll on them.
Yes, on March 26, 2003.
The media was uncomfortable about being pro-American since day 1 of the war, but they were afraid to appear anti-American so they stayed neutral. Now that public opinion is more split, the media is showing their true anti-American colors.
Next weeks's program: "When did you stop beating your wife?"
Then there is a bullet-point setup of EXACTLY where those died; then there was on yet another page an editorial "cartoon" about Cheney answering the question, "Good news about Iraq? My son isn't serving and Halliburton stock is up."
What's so amazing is that in doing this crap, the media completely misses the bigger story. It's like focusing on "wowie-zowie, lookit JEB Stuart's cavalry raid in PA. Guess the North is losing the war," just before Lee is devastated at Gettysburg" . . . BECAUSE of Stuart's stupidity.
I don't think the media is turning against the war in Iraq.
They made that turn years ago.
When were they ever for it???
When have they ever put anything out about this war that wasn't a bunch of slanted, distorted outright lies??
To that question, as asked, I'd be forced to answer "No."
You're not talking about the same CNN that got priority in its coverage from Saddam because he knew he could use them to try to shape international opinion, are you?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1603696/posts
Jeez! Out of touch? Logan is the epitomy of out of touch. Figures she works for CBS (Commie Broadcasting System).
   |
Next, CNN asks, Is the sky blue? Is Anna sexy? Is Steve Jobs the Man at Apple? CNN is all about the hard-hitting truth . . . |
Turning??? When did they ever support it?