Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COEXERJ145

we'd be nuts to not develop this further and in whichever and all directions are possible


7 posted on 03/26/2006 6:44:09 PM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Vn_survivor_67-68
THEL is the Ground-based precursor of this system: It's more practical, more effective, more power/bigger beam (but has to intercept the inbound rockets as they fall towards a high-value target!) ...

Ground-based also has more fuel, bigger tanks than are simpler to reload for a second, third, or fourth missile, easier to support and build.

Limit here is that you have to already be airborne to hit the missile as it's climbing up: if you're that close then the enemy wouldn't shoot. He'd wait until your patrol area was extended or you went further away, then pull the truck-mounted missiles out of hiding and shoot.

If you can spot the trucks or missile launchers, take them out with regular (cheaper) air-to-ground missiles. We couldn't find launchers before, and can't find them now in Iraq when they're buried or in garages and buildings.
50 posted on 03/30/2006 5:13:25 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson