Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: compuguru

There are not many good mirror materials in near UV.


13 posted on 03/26/2006 7:25:48 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: GSlob
Was your reply tongue-in-cheek or are there reflective materials that COULD be used? Is the UV aspect applicable to all three lasers (tracking, atmospheric and "the big one")?

It seems from the article that all three have to work, precisely in sequence, in order to manage a disabling shot. While I'm sure other folks smarter than myself thought about the mirror coating already, there are so many low-tech counters to this weapon that come to my humble mind that I wonder at the wisdom of the vision. Such as: pre-launch chaff missiles, fired just before launch of the payload missile, allowing it to fly through a column of tracking-laser-reflecting chaff. One Soviet tactic was to launch three missiles at once. Will the ABL be able to handle such multiple targets? And, despite stealth technology that the ABL platform may have, its location will be revealed during firing. Will the ABL platform still be able to perform its mission while evading counter-fire from the enemy?

(Placing tin-foil hat firmly on head) Is this ABL story a cover for another purpose for this technology? (Slowly raises eyes to the moon) A purpose where common counter-measures would be ineffectual?
15 posted on 03/26/2006 8:27:25 PM PST by compuguru (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson