I think this is a textbook example of why the right should avoid situations where the media controls the playing field. They will change the rules as needed to deliver the message they want delivered. I think interviews in the field are better - the reporter doesn't have nearly the same chance to control the debate.
Your point is well taken. But at the same time you want to give a journalist the benifit of the doubt that they will handle things professionally.
I guess I am asking toooooo Much!