As Ronald reagan was wont to say, "There you go again..." Once again you accuse people of genocide, but absolutely refuse to apply that to Islam. It is *not* genocide to defend one's self, family and culture against those who have clearly, publicly, and repeatedly uttered genocidal intent on them. It is self-defense.
There *is* a pattern of extortion here, with this drumbeat of "1.2 billion", whether you are willing to acknowledge it, or not. It was only a few short weeks ago, that we saw it in action, where the First Amendment was seriously, voluntarily gutted by those who claimed to be its foremost champions, and the long-held concept that an attack on a nation's embassy was a de-facto attack on that nation (and its allies). This compromised away, and why? So as not to "upset" 1.2 billion tantrum throwing three-year-olds. What else can we expect to see compromised away in the near future, when the process is repeated, which having been eminently successful, you may rest assured will be? *THIS* is a viable solution?
the infowarrior
Cute. "reverse-jihad genocide"??
ALL Muslims can theoretically be deported back to their hell-hole of origin where they can face whatever wrath civilization decides upon the threat of evil psychopaths should the various citizenries demand further protection from this worldwide horde of nuts.
Btw, you were also a HUGE advocate of the Muslim involvement in U.S. Ports as well, weren't you?
Hmmmm...