Free Republic
Browse
·
Search
News/Activism
Topics
·
Post Article
To:
Raycpa; jveritas
Sounds defensive.
60
posted on
03/25/2006 12:21:26 PM PST
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[
Post Reply
|
Private Reply
|
To 51
|
View Replies
]
To:
bnelson44; jveritas
The problem with writing off a defensive chemical unit as irrelevant to the question of chemical weapons use is that such defensive provisions are necessary to have if an army intends to use them.
64
posted on
03/25/2006 12:25:44 PM PST
by
Raycpa
[
Post Reply
|
Private Reply
|
To 60
|
View Replies
]
Free Republic
Browse
·
Search
News/Activism
Topics
·
Post Article
FreeRepublic
, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson