At least here (not elsewhere) we could decentralize schools and allow them greater local control while keeping the high degree of choice that we have here already.
Yes, I can see the argument about inner city kids, though at least here that is an argument used.
Most of my concerns are personal. I believe that if the person has the "choice" to raise a child, they already have one of the best choices one could ever have and the greatest privlege one could ever have. I have been wanting that "choice" for many years and may never get that. I just would like the "choice" to raise just one child. BUT I will never expect someone else to pay for that choice. It will be on my own dime. To complain about a "lack of choice" when one has the choice to raise kids already and then on top of that expect me to subsidize that personal choice does not sit too well with me. I am taking my own "lack" of choice and using it as a vehicle whereby I can serve others while working towards that goal of being able to raise my own child. Like I've said very often, that child I have will not be the most spoiled child, but may be the most loved. If one has several children, I look on that as all the more blessings that one has received (responsibly anyways). And I think a person should thank the guy upstairs for that. I know I would.
Again, I didn't mean to get in a discussion about this. It's my own community and neighborhood that I am most concerned with.