Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ex_desert_cowboy
I don't need 100% risk free for sentencing in any other crime. The death penalty is forever. Can't bring 'em back. We will always live life with the risk of being harmed by criminals.

Why add the risk of a malfunction in the legal system that might put me to death when it is supposed to protect me? A life sentence in a no-frills work camp prison is deterrence enough for me.

19 posted on 03/25/2006 12:24:09 PM PST by manwiththehands (Islam is as Islam does. Islam is as Islam allows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: manwiththehands

Why? Because the death penatly is a deterrant, much as the left likes to say it isn't. Executing criminals saves innocent lives and the statistices are quite astounding. I'm in favor of a stong appeals systems, and after conviction reviews of evidence just to be sure. But, I disagree with the concept that the "state" taking an innocent life is so bad that we let a 1,000 crimnals kill without fear lf losing their own life. The state refusing to do what is reasonably within its power to reduce murder, is also "taking inccocent lives".


20 posted on 03/25/2006 12:31:24 PM PST by ex_desert_cowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson