Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: Jim Robinson
The FEC regulations are horsesh*t.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
2 posted on
03/24/2006 10:02:28 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Jim Robinson
"They've tried to take a light hand, and it looks like they might have succeeded,"
---
a gentle hand can work wonders if applied properly, (not to mention a good swift kick in the arse) ;-)
3 posted on
03/24/2006 10:03:19 PM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Jim Robinson
Does this mean we can start breathing again? I'm turning kinda purple.
4 posted on
03/24/2006 10:04:57 PM PST by
Eastbound
To: Jim Robinson
So what does this mean for message boards?
Does the 500 person limit apply only to emails?
5 posted on
03/24/2006 10:05:09 PM PST by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
To: Jim Robinson
Are you logged in?
If so, DON'T TELL ANYONE!!
I'm with ya, Jim. This is a steaming pile. The time is now.
6 posted on
03/24/2006 10:06:46 PM PST by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: Jim Robinson
Just the fact that they felt the decision was theirs to make is absolutely unacceptable. Don't let this die down - the FEC and BCRA must be abolished if we are to reclaim our freedom of expression.
7 posted on
03/24/2006 10:06:50 PM PST by
thoughtomator
(Symmetry Inspector #7)
To: Jim Robinson
Also exempted from the sweep of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act--better known as the McCain-Feingold law--are e-mail messages sent to 500 or fewer people, posting a video unless it's a paid advertisement, and online activities done by volunteers even if the actions are undertaken without the knowledge of the campaign...Sounds like we all just became Conservative Cause Volunteers
8 posted on
03/24/2006 10:07:02 PM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Jim Robinson
I doubt they have the cojones to do that.
9 posted on
03/24/2006 10:12:54 PM PST by
Texaggie79
(Did I just say that?)
To: Jim Robinson
Sounds like we need a Constitutional amendment that says:
Section 1. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Section 2. We really mean it!
10 posted on
03/24/2006 10:25:37 PM PST by
burzum
(A single reprimand does more for a man of intelligence than a hundred lashes for a fool.--Prov 17:10)
To: Jim Robinson
...FEC lawyers--who are under court order to regulate the Internet--to rethink the rules and adopt a more laissez-faire approach....
Uh-huh. Court order, eh? Time for the PEOPLE to assert our God-Given power and spank, impeach, recall and de-fund a bunch of black-robed Gramsci goons.
11 posted on
03/24/2006 10:28:00 PM PST by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
To: Jim Robinson
>>>>An outcry from bloggers and even members of Congress appears to have caused FEC lawyers--who are under court order to regulate the Internet--to rethink the rules and adopt a more laissez-faire approach.Upon initial reading, this appears to be a satisfactory outcome, if not outright good news.
13 posted on
03/24/2006 10:29:50 PM PST by
Reagan Man
(Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
What I strongly suggest to everyone who's not doing it already is to actually take the time to call every single person who wants your vote and asking them neutral questions about this (and other) issue(s).
For example, I called one fella who was running for mayor here a few years ago and asked, "What is your position on guns?" Not, "What's your position on firearms," as that lets them know what answer I'd hope for. Basically: play dumb. Let them show their hand first.
Then, write the names down and vote how you will.
As an added bonus as a FReeper, post the names and the answers they give here on FR so others who are wondering about these people know what they'll be dealing with. It'd also help if the persons you call decided to try giving differing answers to the same questions. The more eyes on them, the better.
Using our sheer number and our power, we can change this.
14 posted on
03/24/2006 10:39:41 PM PST by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
15 posted on
03/24/2006 10:41:09 PM PST by
GretchenM
(What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
To: Jim Robinson
This is the camels nose under the tent...
Mark my words...this government will attempt to fully regulate, tax, restrict and control internet content, access and distribution in the coming years.
Given the apathetic nature of the 'ordinary' American citizen...this government will succeed in all of the above.
Trust me...
16 posted on
03/24/2006 10:42:19 PM PST by
antaresequity
(PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH - PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
To: Jim Robinson
We own this country, not these parasitic a$$holes. Screw 'em!
18 posted on
03/24/2006 10:53:54 PM PST by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Lancey Howard; potlatch; Smartass; devolve; PhilDragoo
21 posted on
03/24/2006 11:06:56 PM PST by
ntnychik
To: Jim Robinson
The camel's nose is now in the tent.
25 posted on
03/24/2006 11:16:55 PM PST by
TChris
("Wake up, America. This is serious." - Ben Stein)
To: Jim Robinson
Hope-I-understand-this-all-better-after-a-cup-of-coffee-BUMP...
To: Jim Robinson
The First Amendment precludes the FEC from regulating free speech no matter whether they use a "light touch" or not. Congress, pass the Online Freedom of Speech Act, now!
29 posted on
03/24/2006 11:38:21 PM PST by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: Jim Robinson
It's better this fight comes now, than later.
33 posted on
03/25/2006 12:56:38 AM PST by
Treader
(Human convenience is always on the edge of a breakthrough, or a sellout)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson