Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Candidate Accused of 'Donation Swapping'
AP on Yahoo ^ | 3/24/06 | M.L. Johnson - ap

Posted on 03/24/2006 9:44:24 PM PST by NormsRevenge

PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Why would Democrats in Hawaii give money to a U.S. Senate candidate in Rhode Island?

That question is creating a furor around Rhode Island Secretary of State Matt Brown, who is running for the Senate. At issue is whether his campaign engaged in "donation swapping," a practice experts say is a common and legally dubious means of skirting the federal limits on political contributions.

Late last year, Brown received $25,000 from the state Democratic parties in Hawaii, Maine and Massachusetts. Shortly afterward, four of his top donors gave $30,000 to those parties. The donors had already given Brown the maximum allowed under federal law, $4,200.

Critics accuse Brown's campaign of laundering illegal donations, and on Wednesday, the Hawaii Republican Party signed a complaint asking the Federal Elections Commission to investigate.

Brown, who has been running on a clean-government platform, has said he did nothing illegal, but agreed to return the money because it created an "appearance problem."

"This is a run-of-the mill campaign finance tactic," said Nathaniel Persily, a University of Pennsylvania Law School professor who specializes in election laws.

Brown, Rhode Island's top elections official, is one of two Democrats running for the seat held by Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee (news, bio, voting record). The race is considered one of the best chances for Democrats to pick up a seat in the Senate and has already become one of the most expensive in the nation; the four candidates have spent almost $3 million with the primary still six months away.

It is not unusual for candidates to receive money from out-of-state party organizations. But the donations from Hawaii, Maine and Massachusetts raised suspicions because Brown has not even won the Democratic nomination, and it is extremely unusual for party organizations to take sides in a primary.

Brown has said that late last year, his campaign field director contacted the other state parties, asked them to contribute and offered to help them raise money in return. Brown described the offer as a well-intentioned effort to help Democrats around the country.

The treasurer of the Hawaii Democratic Party, Jane Sugimura, told The Associated Press earlier this month that the party and the Brown campaign struck a deal in which the party gave money to Brown in exchange for money from Brown supporters. However, she later said there was no deal.

Specifically earmarking money for a specific candidate and funneling it through a third party to avoid the $4,200 limit is illegal under federal law, said Larry Noble, executive director of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics and a former general counsel for the FEC.

However, proving there was such a deal can be difficult, Noble said.

"There's a fine line between it being just a suggestion that you'll help fundraise and it becoming an earmarked contribution," he said.

FEC spokesman George Smaragdis said he knows of no cases in the past five years in which state parties were fined for donation swapping.

All three state party organizations have since denied any wrongdoing, said there was no deal, and added that they did not even know that Brown had yet to win the nomination. Members of the Hawaii Democratic Party said that if there had been a deal, they would have received the donations before, not after, sending money to Brown.

The Maine Democratic Party's executive director resigned Sunday — the same day the party adopted new rules to prevent leaders from making out-of-state contributions in the future.

Critics say the Brown campaign violated the spirit of the law even if no deal was made.

"It's wrong, and they know it's wrong, and they did it because they thought they could get away with it," said Phil West, executive director of Common Cause of Rhode Island, a nonpartisan watchdog group.

Fundraisers and political scientists say plenty of other campaigns do it as well.

"The fundraising that happens here, happens around the country," said Rick McAuliffe, a Rhode Island Democrat who raised money for John Kerry's 2004 presidential bid.


Associated Press writer Mark Niesse in Honolulu contributed to this story.

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii; US: Rhode Island
KEYWORDS: accused; candidate; donation; donationswapping; swapping

1 posted on 03/24/2006 9:44:26 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Sure smells funny.

2 posted on 03/24/2006 9:47:11 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is why campaign finance laws are ludicrous to begin with. There's always a thousand ways around them that achieve the same effect, but make it harder to tell who is getting support from whom.

3 posted on 03/24/2006 9:50:53 PM PST by thoughtomator (Symmetry Inspector #7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
4 posted on 03/24/2006 9:59:22 PM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

THis is a more serious and direct offense than what DeLay was accused of (realising that the actual evidence doesn't support the accusations in the DeLay case).

Government can't ever get this right. They tried to make it so state parties could have some influence, so they let them give 25,000 without regard to where the money came from. But that's for EACH candidate, and now the idea is to get money from every single state party, something the writers of the legislation probably forgot could happen.

We can't get the money out, because there will always be a George Soros who has the right to spend his own money to get his message out. So instead, we should have instant disclosure. Let Hillary take a million from Barbra "Where DID that 'a' go?" Striesand, and let her constituents ask what Barb gets out of it.

5 posted on 03/24/2006 10:45:50 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

(Rhode Island Secretary of State Matt Brown)"...said he did nothing illegal, but agreed to return the money..." after the shady deals became public.

6 posted on 03/25/2006 12:02:33 AM PST by Daaave ("Gunter glieben glauchen globen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson