To: aculeus
This may be a rhetorical question, but if it's so easy to detect bad art in painting, why is it so hard for us to do it in other art forms such as literature, cinema, music? I mean, say something negative about Tom Clancy ("the most successful bad writer since James Fenimore Cooper"", according to Chris Buckley), or Hairy Potty or the Star Trek kitsch, or, heaven forbid, about Eddie (Van Halen, whodya think?) and you're marked on this forum as an "elitist" with Communist sympathies. Yeah, Eddie, the greatest musician since Mozart!
72 posted on
03/24/2006 7:24:40 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Revolting cat!
I don't know about that other stuff, but you're right abour Eddie Van Halen.
78 posted on
03/24/2006 7:26:34 PM PST by
Crawdad
(So the guy says to the doctor, "It hurts when I do this.")
To: Revolting cat!
I'll bet you don't like the drum solo in "In A Gadda Da Vida" either. Commie.
To: Revolting cat!
. . . if it's so easy to detect bad art in painting, why is it so hard for us to do it in other art forms such as literature, cinema, music? Nah . . . it's just easy in this case.
My favorite bad musician is P.D.Q. Bach . . .
94 posted on
03/24/2006 7:32:50 PM PST by
AnAmericanMother
(Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
To: Revolting cat!
[I]f it's so easy to detect bad art in painting, why is it so hard for us to do it in other art forms such as literature, cinema, music? I mean, say something negative about Tom Clancy ("the most successful bad writer since James Fenimore Cooper"", according to Chris Buckley), or Hairy Potty or the Star Trek kitsch, or, heaven forbid, about Eddie (Van Halen, whodya think?) and you're marked on this forum as an "elitist" with Communist sympathies. Yeah, Eddie, the greatest musician since Mozart! I think there is a difference. What drives me crazy are the Kinkade fans who insist that his work is capital A "art," and going to be a collector's item, a masterpiece, etc. I like some pop culture/kitsch type things, but I don't claim they are an investment. I think it is more about the attitude of the purchaser. I don't display my Harry Potter books in order to convince visitors that I am a literary genius. I read them because I enjoy them. They aren't on display. So I believe it is the combination of displaying the "art" (something you don't do with books, music, cinema, usually) along with the insistence of some fans that Kinkade is the world's most important artist. I'd say he is among the world's marketing greats, but that's about it. But if people enjoy Kinkade and want to hang his work on every surface in their home, I say go for it-- just don't try to tell me you're doing it because he is an Important Artist, or this is an investment.
To: Revolting cat!
Don't forget the boringly pretentious Rush (the band, not the talkshow host).
235 posted on
03/25/2006 11:23:26 AM PST by
Denver Ditdat
(Melting solder since 1975)
To: Revolting cat!
"...or, heaven forbid, about Eddie (Van Halen, whodya think?) and you're marked on this forum as an "elitist" with Communist sympathies. Yeah, Eddie, the greatest musician since Mozart!"
"Now, where did I leave my guitar..."
249 posted on
03/25/2006 2:15:55 PM PST by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Revolting cat!
Hey, I like Eddie, three lead singers can't be wrong.
Next thing you know he's gonna do something pretentious like naming his kid Wolfgang...
300 posted on
03/26/2006 3:38:40 PM PST by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson