Skip to comments.
Saddam, Al Qaeda Did Collaborate, Documents Show
NY Sun ^
| 3/24/06
| Eli Lake
Posted on 03/24/2006 2:08:33 PM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
And the Wash Post and NY Times will be all over this like they were the oil for food scandal.
Maybe if we tell them that GWB's National Guard records are in the released documents, they may run with the story.
1
posted on
03/24/2006 2:08:36 PM PST
by
pissant
To: pissant
But... but... Bush lied and kids died!
::covers ears::
LA LA LA LA LA LA LA!!!!
2
posted on
03/24/2006 2:10:45 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: pissant
but but but.... ummm errr there was... ummm errr but... ahh forget it.
To: pissant; Gordongekko909
Axis of Evil.
We never expected a direct link between Saddam and 9/11 any more than FDR expected a direct link between Hitler and Pearl Harbor.
The lefties understand this -- they pretend not to though.
4
posted on
03/24/2006 2:15:29 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: Gordongekko909
Their world must be crumbling.....I'm just so choked up about that..
5
posted on
03/24/2006 2:16:06 PM PST
by
pissant
To: pissant
My question is: What else did the bogus 9/11 Commission overlook?
6
posted on
03/24/2006 2:16:40 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
To: Echo Talon
7
posted on
03/24/2006 2:16:57 PM PST
by
pissant
To: BenLurkin
Hitler and the Japs did have a relationship, just like Saddam and Al Quaeda.
To: pissant
In an interview yesterday, the current president of the New School University, Bob Kerrey, was careful to say that new documents translated last night by ABC News did not prove Saddam Hussein played a role in any way in plotting the attacks of September 11, 2001. What happened to the Presidents contention that Saddam was involved with Al Qaeda? So like the leftists to keep moving the football. What's next - they find that Saddam did help plan 9/11, but it still doesn't count because he didn't personally participate in the implementation???
9
posted on
03/24/2006 2:17:29 PM PST
by
Kay Ludlow
(Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
To: pissant
In an interview yesterday, the current president of the New School University, Bob Kerrey, was careful to say that new documents translated last night by ABC News did not prove Saddam Hussein played a role in any way in plotting the attacks of September 11, 2001. What happened to the Presidents contention that Saddam was involved with Al Qaeda? So like the leftists to keep moving the football. What's next - they find that Saddam did help plan 9/11, but it still doesn't count because he didn't personally participate in the implementation???
10
posted on
03/24/2006 2:17:34 PM PST
by
Kay Ludlow
(Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
To: BenLurkin
I believe highjackers of all sorts were trained at Salman Pak.
Including al Queda.
11
posted on
03/24/2006 2:18:02 PM PST
by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
To: pissant
Liberal argument that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 just smashed to the ground.
Except for the NY Slimes who'll never report this...CBS will try to say the document is a fake.
12
posted on
03/24/2006 2:18:58 PM PST
by
Brytani
To: BenLurkin
I'm not sure the lefties understand much at all.
13
posted on
03/24/2006 2:19:35 PM PST
by
pissant
To: My2Cents
14
posted on
03/24/2006 2:19:58 PM PST
by
pissant
To: Kay Ludlow
It's the "move the goalposts" trick. And it ain't gonna work! BTW, are you related to Larry?
15
posted on
03/24/2006 2:21:03 PM PST
by
pissant
To: Kay Ludlow
Yeah, "Well, Saddam was involved in the planning and funding of 9/11, but he didn't personally fly any of the planes into the buildings." These people look evil in the face and refuse to acknowledge it, but remember, they have a perverted sense of what actually constitutes "evil."
16
posted on
03/24/2006 2:21:21 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
To: pissant
They misspell Kerrey's last name every time except the first time the mention it. The "Kerry" spelling calls a picture of John "Lurch" Kerry to mind.
Am I the only one that noticed a lot of grammar errors? I like what they're saying but they are struggling to get it said. Must be the results of the NEA-dominated government education system.
17
posted on
03/24/2006 2:22:06 PM PST
by
capt. norm
(If you can't make a mistake, you can't make anything.)
To: Brytani
CBS will try to say the document is a fake.I'm sure they're checking typeface as we speak.
18
posted on
03/24/2006 2:22:21 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
To: Brytani
CBS and document authentication: a match made in heaven.
19
posted on
03/24/2006 2:22:32 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: Brytani
They will move earth and heaven if they think they can show these released documents to be fakes. But won't lift a finger if someone slips them a secret document saying Bush is a KKK memeber.
20
posted on
03/24/2006 2:22:49 PM PST
by
pissant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson