To: b4its2late
My question is, why on earth would we tell anyone of an attack plan in the first place?
5 posted on
03/24/2006 11:32:20 AM PST by
Cyclone59
(If a cat chokes on a mouse, who killed who?)
To: Cyclone59
"My question is, why on earth would we tell anyone of an attack plan in the first place?"
Looks like our dis information campaign worked. No doubt in my mind that we knew that the Russians were helping Saddam. Wasn't it the Russians who persuaded Saddam that we would never attach, and helped catch them with there turbines down.
27 posted on
03/24/2006 11:59:31 AM PST by
stubernx98
(cranky, but reasonable)
To: Cyclone59
Re:
My question is, why on earth would we tell anyone of an attack plan in the first place? All signifacant military victory is based on deception.
50 posted on
03/24/2006 12:36:47 PM PST by
ChadGore
(VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans. We Vote.)
To: Cyclone59
My question is, why on earth would we tell anyone of an attack plan in the first place?
I didn't catch it all so don't take it as gospel, but Brett Baer on Fox News was just reporting that the Pentagon released info to him that came - as I understood it - from Iraqi memos. The memos said the Russians received the information about troop numbers from a source inside "Centcom."
Baer's report, at least, suggested to me they were talking about a spy for the Russians.
52 posted on
03/24/2006 12:39:45 PM PST by
SittinYonder
(That's how I saw it, and see it still.)
To: Cyclone59
We didn't tell them, they penetrated our intel and command services. The KGB didn't go anywhere...it just changed it's name. Every nation has it's own agenda, I for one will never trust the Russians.
84 posted on
03/24/2006 6:20:52 PM PST by
Blue Scourge
(USAF....when it has to be blown up now, accept no substitute)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson