Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. War Plan Leaked to Iraqis by Russian Ambassador
U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Office ^ | Iraq Intelligence Service

Posted on 03/24/2006 7:20:20 AM PST by b2stealth

The full documents can be found on the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Office Web site: http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/products-docex.htm.

Note: Document titles were added by ABC News.

"U.S. War Plan Leaked to Iraqis by Russian Ambassador"

Two Iraqi documents from March 2003 — on the eve of the U.S.-led invasion — and addressed to the secretary of Saddam Hussein, describe details of a U.S. plan for war. According to the documents, the plan was disclosed to the Iraqis by the Russian ambassador.

Document written sometime before March 5, 2003

The first document (CMPC-2003-001950) is a handwritten account of a meeting with the Russian ambassador that details his description of the composition, size, location and type of U.S. military forces arrayed in the Gulf and Jordan. The document includes the exact numbers of tanks, armored vehicles, different types of aircraft, missiles, helicopters, aircraft carriers, and other forces, and also includes their exact locations. The ambassador also described the positions of two Special Forces units.

Document dated March 25, 2003

The second document (CMPC-2004-001117) is a typed account, signed by Deputy Foreign Minister Hammam Abdel Khaleq, that states that the Russian ambassador has told the Iraqis that the United States was planning to deploy its force into Iraq from Basra in the South and up the Euphrates, and would avoid entering major cities on the way to Baghdad, which is, in fact what happened. The documents also state "Americans are also planning on taking control of the oil fields in Kirkuk." The information was obtained by the Russians from "sources at U.S. Central Command in Doha, Qatar," according to the document.

This document also includes an account of an amusing incident in which several Iraqi Army officers (presumably seeking further elaboration of the U.S. war plans) contacted the Russian Embassy in Baghdad and stated that the ambassador was their source. Needless to say, this caused great embarrassment to the ambassador, and the officers were instructed "not to mention the ambassador again in that context."

(Editor's Note: The Russian ambassador in March 2003 was Vladimir Teterenko. Teterenko appears in documents released by the Volker Commission, which investigated the Oil for Food scandal, as receiving allocations of 3 million barrels of oil — worth roughly $1.5 million. )


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: enemy; iraq; leaks; mole; putin; russia; teterenko; warplans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
FSB(KGB) INSIDE US Central Command! So much for our "friend" Putin "helping" us on WOT!
1 posted on 03/24/2006 7:20:23 AM PST by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Neophyte; Stellar Dendrite; lizol; GSlob; Tailgunner Joe; adam_az

Ping


2 posted on 03/24/2006 7:22:43 AM PST by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

Freakin Putin was the one who "warned" Pres Bush, in Oct 2001, that Iraq was planning a follow-on terrorist attack agsint the USA.


3 posted on 03/24/2006 7:25:02 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

Yep, two lessons:

1. Putin is not President Bush's loyal buddy
2. The American military is even more amazing than we already knew.


4 posted on 03/24/2006 7:26:43 AM PST by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

Am I the only one that doesn't see the "humor" in someone in Central Command passing information to the Russians? Time for the firing squads. It shouldn't be too difficult to find out who did this.


5 posted on 03/24/2006 7:26:47 AM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

1. Fat lot of good it did them. Shows that army even more incompetent than I'd already thought it.

2. Fix the people who told the Russians in the first place.

3. The Russians are not our friends.


6 posted on 03/24/2006 7:26:59 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Pray for Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth
Exactly the way it worked through Korea via the UN.
7 posted on 03/24/2006 7:27:01 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

Multiple postings on this subject from various sources.
The good news there is that the story seems to be spreading.


8 posted on 03/24/2006 7:27:15 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

Document: CMPC-2003-001950

Translator: Sammi @ Ray Robison

March 24, 2006 05:52 AM

Office of the Presidency
Mr. Secretary (of the President)

Subject: Meeting with the Russian Ambassador

Best of our salutes,

We would like to inform you that the Russian ambassador met this evening with the general director of Foreign Economic Relations and the General Director of the Grains Trade and told us the following:

1- Provide the necessary facilitations for the travel of the Russian experts working in the projects of our ministry (probably grains or trade experts) without any delay for the period of time between the 5th and 8th of March. The last plane will take off on the 9th of March. He mentioned (the ambassador) that the request of evacuating the Russian citizens follows an order from the Russian president.

2- He said that Russia, France and Germany and both Syria and China were expected to join the three of them, have prepared a project of resolution opposing the Anglo-American project submitted to the United Nations. Voting on both projects will take place on the 9th of March. He pointed that some countries of the Security Council might refrain from voting, like Pakistan, Chili and Kenya.

3- During the meeting the ambassador gave us the following information about the US military presence in the Gulf as per the 2nd of March:

Number of troops: 206,500 out of which 98,000 naval forces and 36,500
infantry. 90% of theses forces are in Kuwait and on the Navy ships.

US troops have reached the island of Bubiyan (Bubiyan is largest Kuwaiti island in the Kuwaiti coastal islands chain)

Number of tanks: 480
Number of armored cars: 1132
Number of artillery: 296
Number of Apache helicopters : 735
Number of fighter planes: 871
Number of Navy ships: 106. 68 in the Gulf and the rest in Oman (State of Oman), Aden (Yemen), the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.
Number of air carriers: 5. One nuclear powered. Three in the Gulf one in the Mediterranean and one on its way.
Number of Cruise missiles: 583 based on the US Navy and distributed on 22 ships.
Number of Cruise missiles on planes: 64
Number of heavy bombers B-52 H: 10 in the Indian Ocean.
Number of B1-B: 8 present in the US base of Thumarid in Oman.

4- The ambassador pointed that what worried us (most probably “us” refers to the Russians) was the increase in the number of planes in Jordan where the number of planes in Al Sallt base was as follows:
24 planes F-16
10 planes Tornado
11 planes Harrier
He also mentioned that there were 10 A-10 tank destroyers in the Jordanian base of King Faysal.

5- The ambassador also pointed that a certain number of the 82nd Division (82nd Airborne) which was deployed in Afghanistan started coming to Kuwait. The number of troops has reached 750 soldiers.


]Translator’s note: The original Iraqi document is made of four pages. The released document shows only three pages. It is not improbable that the fourth page could have been lost or might show up in a different release.]

Original Arabic: here.

 

SOURCE
9 posted on 03/24/2006 7:28:57 AM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

Nothing to see here. Move along. No story here. Please go read about the umpteen people killed in Iraq today and how it is plunging into civil war.


10 posted on 03/24/2006 7:29:01 AM PST by Thrusher ("...there is no peace without victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth

Google finds his name: Titorenko.

I tried to see if there was a connection with Joe Wilson. THAT would have been fun! :)


11 posted on 03/24/2006 7:30:01 AM PST by mosquitobite (The penalty for refusing to participate in politics is you end up being governed by your inferiors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Gosh, I wonder if this possibly had any connection to do with that whole "Oil-for-Food Scandal" thing that somebody somewhere once said something about.


12 posted on 03/24/2006 7:31:30 AM PST by Thrusher ("...there is no peace without victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thrusher
"4- The ambassador pointed that what worried us (most probably “us” refers to the Russians) was the increase in the number of planes in Jordan where the number of planes in Al Sallt base was as follows:"

I wonder why that worried them - did they think it might tip the balance and cause Iraq to lose? If so they must have gotten a helluva awakening the next day.
13 posted on 03/24/2006 7:31:40 AM PST by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito

But but but...in DESERT STORM the Russians became our allies. Intelligence sharing was rife. Apparently still is.

And remember, in 2003, we STILL trying to woo the Rooskis into joining us and supporting a UN action.


14 posted on 03/24/2006 7:32:08 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Thrusher

The Russian ambassador in March 2003 was Vladimir Teterenko. Teterenko appears in documents released by the Volker Commission, which investigated the Oil for Food scandal, as receiving allocations of 3 million barrels of oil — worth roughly $1.5 million.

See:

http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=1734490&page=1


15 posted on 03/24/2006 7:35:03 AM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

The problem is that there is undercover war going on by Russian SVR and KGB (FSB) and Putin's Russia is not our friend - there is no denying of it now.

We also have 5-6 people here on FR who were saying it ain't so.. We need to take a closer look who they are and who they work for..
16 posted on 03/24/2006 7:35:10 AM PST by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: b2stealth
I could hardly care any less that a Russian ambassador leaked this information. What I want to know is how the heck the ambassador got this information to begin with.

 

17 posted on 03/24/2006 7:36:18 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
As a general rule all Russian embassy employees are officers of FSB(KGB) or SVR..
18 posted on 03/24/2006 7:37:46 AM PST by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thrusher
"Gosh, I wonder if this possibly had any connection to do with that whole "Oil-for-Food Scandal" thing that somebody somewhere once said something about."

I'm sure you are right. I was thinking that Russia may not have like the spectacle of a large Army using expensive Russian weaponry getting wiped off the map.
19 posted on 03/24/2006 7:37:54 AM PST by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

I think Oil-for-food was just a way to "pay" Russians for their services..

They were smiling to us same time they were doing this behind our backs!


20 posted on 03/24/2006 7:40:38 AM PST by b2stealth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson