Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dimensio

You mean precedents like "Dred Scott" and "Plessy vs. Ferguson." I wouldn't rule in favor of slavery and segregation, but they were once your sacred "precedents."

There are liberal judges ruling against the Pledge of Allegiance and for Gitmo terror suspects, so lets get some conservative judges who will stir up dust and in the style of Gen. George S. Patton: "Grab those precedents by the nose and kick em' in the a**."

And that includes the 1987 decision of the Supreme Court that was Jones' "precedent"
in this case.


89 posted on 03/24/2006 9:07:01 AM PST by Nextrush (The Chris Matthews Band: "I get high..I get high...I get high..McCain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Nextrush

So what, exactly, is bad about this particular ruling?


102 posted on 03/24/2006 10:29:53 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson