[CarolinaGuitarman]

" TOE is by design darwin's description of evidence."

No, it isn't. It has been verified by thousands of different scientists in many different fields. If what Darwin proposed didn't hold up, most scientists wouldn't have accepted it and would still not accept it.

"You find it credible and that is your God given right as is mine to see the incredibleness of the theory."

Because I actually understand the theory, and you don't.

" This is just plain funny considering all that art work without one cell of evidence used to promote darwin."

You have seen and been presented with literally thousands of pages of evidence for evolution. I have yet to see ONE piece of evidence for ID/creationism. ID is gutless choice, and the promoters of the claim are trying to sidestep accepted scientific practice to get their theological claim into a science classroom. They are trying to use the power of government to change what science is. They are leftists in conservative clothing.

" Well to say more would be to identify without permission, suffice it to say somebody got a 'cut' in funding."

So, you made a claim you couldn't back up. I see. :)

[Just mythoughts]

"No, it isn't. It has been verified by thousands of different scientists in many different fields. If what Darwin proposed didn't hold up, most scientists wouldn't have accepted it and would still not accept it."

Alllll verification is already premised upon the foundation darwin penned, there was no creation, crap just happened!!!!

Funny that old Darwin has become the premier creator of a theory designing the "scientific methodology" explaining how crap just happened.