[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Science has become as "fundamentalist" as it claims the supporters of Creationism are. "

No it hasn't. Non-science like ID/creationism just doesn't belong in a science classroom. Period.

"Maybe one day new ideas will be accepted by scientists, they were before, but for now its "evolution or else." "

ID isn't even close to being new. In it's modern form it is over 200 years old.

"Click the boot heels and salute. "Hail Evolution.""

Ah, the Nazi reference. I was waiting for that. It shows the deficiency of your argument.

Now, are you going to continue to dodge my question?

If ID isn't supposed to be about religion/God, then why do ID proponents whine about religious intolerance and anti-christian bigotry when ID is attacked by scientists?

Are you just not capable of answering this question? :)

[Nextrush]

I'm not here to talk about what's "religion" and what's not.
Freedom is my idea and all ideas need to be heard. The anti-ID people seem to be in the censorship business, that's my point.