To: Nextrush
Interesting isn't it that the government dictated and funded theory has no credibility until the judicial system made it so. All manner of "end of civilization" language has been spewed out upon any and all who find darwin's theory full of holes. To disbelieve in darwinism is to be called a cancer or members of radical terrorist based religions.
Prevention of the end of civilization requires action, so how far are the darwinists willing to go to protect their civilization?
To: Just mythoughts
"Interesting isn't it that the government dictated and funded theory has no credibility until the judicial system made it so."
Would be interesting if it were true.
"All manner of "end of civilization" language has been spewed out upon any and all who find darwin's theory full of holes. To disbelieve in darwinism is to be called a cancer or members of radical terrorist based religions."
Hyperventilate much?
"Prevention of the end of civilization requires action, so how far are the darwinists willing to go to protect their civilization?"
We've got the Germ Theory, remember? :)
18 posted on
03/24/2006 5:28:31 AM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: Just mythoughts
Prevention of the end of civilization requires action, so how far are the darwinists willing to go to protect their civilization? Paging Nehemiah Scudder. Pick up the white courtesy telephone please.
26 posted on
03/24/2006 6:41:52 AM PST by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson