Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Gentle reminder: Now hear this: No personal attacks (title of thread posted 15 March 2006 by Jim Robinson).
1 posted on 03/24/2006 4:03:44 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 360 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

2 posted on 03/24/2006 4:04:56 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
... "It builds up and builds up and builds up to the point where some people engage in violence," Cornyn said. "Certainly without any justification, but a concern that I have."


Well, either Cornyn isn't a student of history, or he falsely believes pitchforks, sythes and muskets are no longer able to win revolutions.


By all means, keep that deaf ear toward the populace until " some many people engage in violence".



Is that the winds of change I smell?




4 posted on 03/24/2006 4:20:20 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
"Judge John E. Jones III could still be chairman of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board if millions of evangelical Christians had not pulled the lever for George W. Bush in 2000," Schlafly wrote less than two weeks after the decision. "Yet this federal judge, who owes his position entirely to those voters and the president who appointed him, stuck the knife in the backs of those who brought him to the dance in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District."

But I thought Intelligent Design wasn't about religion.

5 posted on 03/24/2006 4:37:59 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Cornyn hinted after the judge's decision that such rulings could lead to violence.

"It builds up and builds up and builds up to the point where some people engage in violence," Cornyn said. "Certainly without any justification, but a concern that I have."

Translation into normal speech for the rest of us: "Judges had better rule the way I wish, OR ELSE."

6 posted on 03/24/2006 4:39:17 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Judge Jones seems to be seeing the "bogey man" here. In fact, the media blows up the comments of "terrorists" like Ann Coulter and Phyllis Schlafly to link them to "threats" against judges. The worst part of the story is when they bring in the judge's family murdered in Chicago last year. That was about a personal matter, nothing social or political.

If Judge Jones feels threatened or was threatened, why haven't we heard about arrests? Isn't that a crime? Or was this the work of liberal trolls who stopped short of a crime or just some people P.O.'ed with bad decisions like this one.

I think his decision stank and citing a precedent doesn't make it right. Would Judge Jones have upheld the "Plessy vs. Ferguson" precedent or perhaps the "Dred Scott" precedent? The liberal federal judges have no problem killing the Pledge of Allegiance or ruling for terror suspects at Gitmo.

Judge Jones is a protege of the "moderate" Tom Ridge. (Who raised taxes and increased spending, besides being pro abortion and claiming to be a "fiscal conservative". He even cut a deal giving the legislature automatic cost of living raises every year.) And President Bush and his buddy Ridge naturally worked out this post for Ridge's man.

I sure hope Alito and Roberts vote the right way on Roe vs. Wade or else the GOP could feel some heat.


11 posted on 03/24/2006 5:00:04 AM PST by Nextrush (The Chris Matthews Band: "I get high..I get high...I get high..McCain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Intelligent design is the idea that the complexity of life demands a creator.

Ho hum.... another day, another simplistic mischaraterization of Intelligent Design Theory...

19 posted on 03/24/2006 5:28:38 AM PST by mikeus_maximus (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
While no single e-mail may have reached the level of a direct threat...

It appears that public officials prefer the sheep to meekly accept whatever ruling they make. Voicing dissent must be crushed.

22 posted on 03/24/2006 5:53:21 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Celebrity victim status. Get some! / sarc

The nutjob of a judge is in less danger than almost anyone on the planet. I am sure that prominent ID supporters have been subjected to the same sort of thing, and no one cares. No one is up in arms. But the darling of the atheist left? Well!

Now if he were a believing Christian, a convert from Islam, in Afghanistan, I'd be concerned for his safety. For that matter, if he were merely an avowed atheist living in any Islamic country he'd require round-the-clock protection, which he wouldn't get.

23 posted on 03/24/2006 6:01:22 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
The writers argue that Jones' decision was the work of "an activist judge" and that he ignored the science behind intelligent design.

DI was given the opprotunity to present their "science behind intelligent design".

Why didn't they?

31 posted on 03/24/2006 7:10:24 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
"Judge John E. Jones III could still be chairman of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board if millions of evangelical Christians had not pulled the lever for George W. Bush in 2000,"

Schlafly wrote less than two weeks after the decision.

"Yet this federal judge, who owes his position entirely to those voters and the president who appointed him, stuck the knife in the backs of those who brought him to the dance in Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District."

I used to think that Schlafly was more savvy than this.

Did all those Evangelicals vote for W. because they wanted it taught that the hypothetical designer may be dead, as Behe testified?

67 posted on 03/24/2006 8:17:50 AM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
from the article:

"Had I ignored existing precedent," he said, "that would have been the work of an activist judge."

Exactly, as I have been saying ever since the decision in Kiztmiller. What Judge Jones did in this case is the very antithesis of "judicial activism."

In the Un-Discovery Institute's book that purports to refute the judge's decision, I wonder how many pages are devoted to the lies made under oath by some of the defendants in the case, or how much time they spend discussing the voluminous evidence presented at trial which proved that the "ID" text book "Of Pandas and People" is nothing but an old Creationist text in which the replaced the words for "Creationism" with the words "Intelligent Design" without so much as even changing definitions.

68 posted on 03/24/2006 8:19:15 AM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I wonder if these are from the same people that gave Paul Mirecki a beating.


110 posted on 03/24/2006 11:37:58 AM PST by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
In the days after U.S. Judge John E. Jones III issued his decision in Dover's intelligent design case, outraged people sent threatening e-mails to his office.

Religion of Peace?

137 posted on 03/24/2006 1:17:25 PM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Another "Religion of Peace" strikes again....


176 posted on 03/25/2006 11:25:26 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
"Jones said such remarks (by Ann Coulter) could fuel irrational acts by misguided individuals thinking they're being patriotic."

Doesn't butthead Jones understand that the usurption of the legislative process by the courts and the dictates of their decisions are the triggers of these comments and actions???

Or do they realize it and don't give a SH*T?
198 posted on 03/26/2006 4:14:11 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson