Skip to comments.
Global warming to up ocean level by meters in 100 years: studies
www.chinaview.cn ^
| 2006-03-24 08:59:08
Posted on 03/23/2006 10:13:01 PM PST by quantim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Yikes, third time this week had to move my lawnmower.
1
posted on
03/23/2006 10:13:04 PM PST
by
quantim
To: quantim
When it hits 200 miles, I got beach front property!
To: quantim
Unless, of course, we head into a new ice age.
3
posted on
03/23/2006 10:16:45 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
To: quantim
...conditions last seen 129,000 years ago, between the last two ice ages ...In other words, a return to the natural state of things as the earth goes through its cycles.
4
posted on
03/23/2006 10:16:47 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("If I were a Cuban, I'd certainly be on a raft," Isane Aparicio Busto)
To: quantim
"During the last 10 years, we have seen only about 10 percent of the greenhouse warming expected during the next 100 years"
Let me give you some more startling statistics:
50% of all doctors were in the lower half of their class.
2/5ths of all sick leave by american workers were taken on Monday or Friday.
62.3% of all statistics you read on the internet were made up on the spot.
5
posted on
03/23/2006 10:21:15 PM PST
by
Lokibob
(Spelling and typos are copyrighted. Please do not use.)
To: quantim
It looks like the chinese have discovered the liberal method of predicting adversity. Make dire predictions on such a scale that they are unverifiably long. Those who might remember your alarmism are long dead when your time scale expires.
If the oceans rise by meters in 100 years, how much will the level rise by December 31, 2007?
6
posted on
03/23/2006 10:23:05 PM PST
by
Nomorjer Kinov
(If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
To: quantim
Meanwhile there's bird flu and the tali ban, which the chicoms will likely join up with to at to the misery. GW? Ya ain't gotta chance, go away.
7
posted on
03/23/2006 10:24:28 PM PST
by
Waco
To: abbi_normal_2; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; AMDG&BVMH; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
8
posted on
03/23/2006 10:27:19 PM PST
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: quantim
The sooner they swamp downtown Santa Cruz, the better.
9
posted on
03/23/2006 10:28:42 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Carry_Okie
Hey....make it the whole LEFT Coast and you got a deal!
10
posted on
03/23/2006 10:34:17 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
To: quantim
10 posts and I am the first to say it?
It is all BUSH'S FAULT!
11
posted on
03/23/2006 10:37:40 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Diplomacy is what you do after you kick the enemy's ass and define their lives afterward)
To: Waco
Meanwhile there's bird flu and the tali ban.And also West Nile, it's a killer.
12
posted on
03/23/2006 10:44:50 PM PST
by
quantim
(A gullible public is the best friend of a weak politician.)
To: quantim
I fail to see the downside. Warmer is good. More water is good.
To: My2Cents
Unless, of course, we head into a new ice age. And, Rush did a good piece on global warming. More stuff was thrown into the air when Karakatoa blew than all the smog by petroleum burning. Teh there's Mt. Vesuvius, Mt. St. Helens...
14
posted on
03/23/2006 10:49:28 PM PST
by
Cobra64
To: quantim
According to the computer simulationsGarbage in, garbage out.
15
posted on
03/23/2006 10:49:54 PM PST
by
FOG724
(http://nationalgrange.org/legislation/phpBB2/index.php)
To: quantim
You've got to love these computer sims which assume future unlimited exponential growth.
Current ocean level growth rates are 3mm per year, of which only about ten percent is supposedly due to melting ice. That adds up to exactly one foot in a hundred years. By assuming exponential growth in the rate of sea level rise, they project a rise ten or twenty TIMES higher.
The reason they are posting such absurd numbers is obvious. Nobody is going to spend billions trying to avoid a sea level rise of only 1 foot.
16
posted on
03/23/2006 10:59:05 PM PST
by
Mr170IQ
To: quantim
I won't be around in a 100 years. Big deal if the ocean rises up a couple of feet.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
17
posted on
03/23/2006 11:04:06 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Lokibob
That looks more like 100% to me... ;>)
To: My2Cents
BINGO....we have a winner.....
Unless we we have an ice age"
Global warming melts the ice so turning off the warm gulf stream and ....voila....instant ice age.
19
posted on
03/23/2006 11:28:25 PM PST
by
spokeshave
(I'd rather go hunting with Dick Cheney than drive over a bridge with Ted Kennedy)
To: My2Cents
Unless, of course, we head into a new ice age.Can't do that. We already had a "coming ice age" back in the late 60's early 70's.
What will they dream up next?!
20
posted on
03/23/2006 11:47:32 PM PST
by
BJungNan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson