Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grass-Roots Activists and Bloggers Brace for New Regulation [McCain gunning for the Net]
Newsmax ^ | 3/23/06 | Jason Barnes

Posted on 03/23/2006 7:14:40 PM PST by defenderSD

Edited on 03/23/2006 7:36:44 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Gordongekko909
Why doesn't this regulate the "news" orgs?

They are political orgs, with political operatives threatening politicians with smears if they don't vote a certain way, and giving them good press if they do vote their way.

That sounds like lobbying to me.
21 posted on 03/23/2006 7:49:00 PM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
They can go to Hell.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

My blog is mine. It is the Internet-accessable expression of my Constitutional right, recognized by the First Amendment. Free Republic is the same.

No legislation is needed. Indeed, any legislation to "protect" my right to speak is probably itself Unconstitutional.

I am not about to file any @#$@#$ reports to the #$@$ Federal Government about my First Amendment rights.

22 posted on 03/23/2006 7:52:05 PM PST by filbert (More filbert at http://www.medary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
Money is not corrupt. The corruption is in the halls of congress. Do not punish the citizens for the crimes perpetrated by corrupt politicians. Catch the bastards taking the bribes and lock them up!

What part of the first amendment do these a-holes not understand?!!

We're bugging them? That's it. Time to get on the phones faxes, email and snail mail. Pour it on!!
23 posted on 03/23/2006 7:52:08 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD


This is why i will never, EVER vote for mccain. I don't give a damn if hillary is his opponent, i will never vote for this free speech limiting ego maniac.


24 posted on 03/23/2006 7:57:28 PM PST by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Vote against every incumbent and put the bastards where they belong-- on the unemployment line-- and start all over again with a whole new house, a 33% new senate, and a firm realization among the other two-thirds of the turds that they are certain, absolutely certain, to be out of work in two or four years. Get rid of these freeloaders and brigands; get rid of them all and without exception! Harsh words follow with respect to the lower and lowest houses.


25 posted on 03/23/2006 7:58:10 PM PST by mathurine (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1601416/posts


I like Jim Rob's take on it.


26 posted on 03/23/2006 8:01:22 PM PST by Just Lori (To everything, there is a season.........Ecclesiastes, 3:1-8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
Traditional media organizations have come out in favor of increased regulation. "It is imperative," wrote the New York Times in an editorial, "that the courageous lawmakers who supported the McCain-Feingold reform law four years ago stand together against making the Internet a cornucopia of political corruption."

This is revolting. Corrupt politicians and the dino media tired of being exposed as total frauds, so why not just snip away at that pesky first amendment (after nonstop attempts to destroy the 2nd)? This is a huge wake-up call.

27 posted on 03/23/2006 8:02:29 PM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD; Jim Robinson
Senators John McCain, R-Ariz., and Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., are pushing a proposal to require these organizations to register and to report to Congress on their activities. Failure to comply would result in civil or criminal penalties.

Ok, I did not know about this part. McCain and Lieberman are treasonous scum.

As usual, Jim Robinson is right and I am wrong.

28 posted on 03/23/2006 8:02:39 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
we thought McCain Feingold campaign finance reform would be struck down as well and it didn't happen. This cannot be allowed to leave congress.

Why didn't Bush veto that thing? Could he give Americans their Free Speech rights back by executive order?

29 posted on 03/23/2006 8:07:06 PM PST by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mathurine
the Online Freedom of Speech Act proposed by Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, The "blogger protection bill," as it is known in some circles, simply codifies the current status of Internet bloggers. Senators Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Harry Reid, D-Nev., are co-sponsoring a similar bill in the Senate

You might want to keep these guys and anyone else who supports this except for reid who should be tossed for other reasons.

30 posted on 03/23/2006 8:10:31 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis

I don't think CFR applies to this. CFR has passed a long time ago and to date there is no effect on FR, DU, or other internet sites. The mccain/lieberman proposal is the one that should be shot down along with any new FEC ruling that CFR applies to the internet.


31 posted on 03/23/2006 8:12:56 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
We will definitely NOT do that. If we have to shut down FR and reopen outside the country, so be it. But we will never register and report on our activities to Congress. Its NONE of the politicians' business what organizations do or don't do in the way of speech and political activities.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

32 posted on 03/23/2006 8:18:29 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD; Jim Robinson

This is a bluff. They're going after money in the form of taxation. They want to tax us into silence.


33 posted on 03/23/2006 8:20:12 PM PST by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Term Limits


34 posted on 03/23/2006 8:22:29 PM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis
Why didn't Bush veto that thing? Could he give Americans their Free Speech rights back by executive order?

Because having McKrazy an enemy would have been a big pain in the @ss. I suppose President Bush thought the SCOTUS would knockdown the BS McCain-Feingold.

If I recall correctly, McCain-Feingold barely passed 5 to 4. This illegal law may not be able to stand another challenge with Alito and Roberts on the Supreme Court.

35 posted on 03/23/2006 8:25:12 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
When tyrants get control of the government by force of guns, they will say that there are too many guns in the land, and take away the guns ... of those who would oppose them.

When dishonest politicians get control of the government by force of corruption and bribery, they will say that there is too much money in politics, and take away the money ... of those who would oppose them.

When evil gains control by lies, the evil will say there is too much unfair, unbalanced and biased speech in the land, and take away the free speech ... of those who would oppose them.

When guns and money and free speech are outlawed, it is not just the outlaw who will still have guns and money and speech ... it is also the evil, the corrupt and the tyrant.

36 posted on 03/23/2006 8:28:40 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (The biggest Lie of all: that we are the Master of Knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Mccain/lieberman has a long way to go before becoming law.


37 posted on 03/23/2006 8:29:36 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

I must be having a bad dream. 30 day shutdown? What's next, no free speech on the web. THIS IS BULL CRAP!


38 posted on 03/23/2006 8:30:49 PM PST by Blowtorch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
If I recall correctly, McCain-Feingold barely passed 5 to 4.

And in the Senate I think it was the usual suspect RINOs that joined the 'rats so there was no fear of a veto.

Bush needs to set this thing right...and now.

39 posted on 03/23/2006 8:39:16 PM PST by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis
"Why didn't Bush veto that thing?"

That's the $64,000 question. Huge mistake.

40 posted on 03/23/2006 8:40:23 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson