Skip to comments.
Grass-Roots Activists and Bloggers Brace for New Regulation [McCain gunning for the Net]
Newsmax ^
| 3/23/06
| Jason Barnes
Posted on 03/23/2006 7:14:40 PM PST by defenderSD
Edited on 03/23/2006 7:36:44 PM PST by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Hey all you senators and congresscritters. Stop trying to silence us. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. There are other career opportunities for you.
To: All
This situation is worse than I thought. We all have to get cracking on this issue and defend our 1st amendment rights.
2
posted on
03/23/2006 7:17:24 PM PST
by
defenderSD
(¤¤ Wishing, hoping, and praying that Saddam will not nuke us is not a national security policy.)
To: defenderSD
Another violation of our 1st amendment rights these clowns are trying to take away.
To: defenderSD
It's the liberals' fault, they wanted this stupid, unconstitutional law, and now they've ruined it for both us and them.
To: freepatriot32
ping
action called for
on free speach
5
posted on
03/23/2006 7:21:39 PM PST
by
winston2
(In matters of necessity let there be unity, in matters of doubt liberty, and in all things charity:)
To: defenderSD
what is the bill # and who is the sponsor(s)?
6
posted on
03/23/2006 7:24:25 PM PST
by
o_zarkman44
(ELECT SOME WORKERS AND REMOVE THE JERKERS!!)
To: The Old Hoosier
I sense that Bush signed CFR because he wanted McCain's support on other issues, but I have no idea how the SCOTUS could possibly say that McCain Feingold is constitutional. That decision still floors me. We've got to get moving here; I admit that I haven't been following this closely enough and it's a much more serious threat than I thought. I'm gonna contact my congressman, Trent Franks, tomorrow and urge him to vote for the Blogger Protection bill.
7
posted on
03/23/2006 7:26:41 PM PST
by
defenderSD
(¤¤ Wishing, hoping, and praying that Saddam will not nuke us is not a national security policy.)
To: defenderSD
it figures that McCain is behind this. he knows the supreme court will back him up like they did the campaign finance blastphemy.
8
posted on
03/23/2006 7:27:48 PM PST
by
o_zarkman44
(ELECT SOME WORKERS AND REMOVE THE JERKERS!!)
To: o_zarkman44
I'll have to look that up for you. It should be somewhere in the long thread from last night started by Jim Robinson. If you search Jim's posts you'll find a long one with over 1,000 replies from last night.
9
posted on
03/23/2006 7:28:07 PM PST
by
defenderSD
(¤¤ Wishing, hoping, and praying that Saddam will not nuke us is not a national security policy.)
To: defenderSD
Get the emails off to your Senators and Representatives!
10
posted on
03/23/2006 7:28:23 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
To: o_zarkman44
I'm not so sure the SCOTUS would approve restrictions on bloggers, but I don't want this to go that far! That's the last hurdle in the path to regulation. With Roberts and Alito on the court this regulation would probably be struck down, but I don't want to see if go that far.
11
posted on
03/23/2006 7:29:47 PM PST
by
defenderSD
(¤¤ Wishing, hoping, and praying that Saddam will not nuke us is not a national security policy.)
To: The Old Hoosier
It's the liberals' fault, they wanted this stupid, unconstitutional law, and now they've ruined it for both us and them.Yep. And let us not forget that many of those liberals are the Republicans who helped pass it- and sadly, also signed it into law.
But now we have a new court. Is there hope yet?
12
posted on
03/23/2006 7:31:05 PM PST
by
ovrtaxt
(Join the FR folding team!! http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=teampage&teamnum=36120)
To: o_zarkman44; MNJohnnie
13
posted on
03/23/2006 7:33:48 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(Excuse me Helen, I'm answering your first accusation. - President Bush)
To: defenderSD
As as I am concerned, the regulations don't exist. Come and arrest me, you fascist jack-booted thugs.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
14
posted on
03/23/2006 7:35:26 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: defenderSD
we thought McCain Feingold campaign finance reform would be struck down as well and it didn't happen. This cannot be allowed to leave congress. We need to target the sponsors with threats of a voter uprising from their respective states. We have to mobilize the people to get the message out and quickly.
As was stated in the article in this context........the government is there to serve the people, not the people there to serve the government.
15
posted on
03/23/2006 7:36:03 PM PST
by
o_zarkman44
(ELECT SOME WORKERS AND REMOVE THE JERKERS!!)
To: o_zarkman44
Yep. Its time to engage in MASS CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE. That's the way to gum up the works. Like I said, if they want to silence us, they're going to have to arrest people. We will NOT do their dirty work for them.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
16
posted on
03/23/2006 7:37:53 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: defenderSD
The High Court has been wrong before. We have two new members and the real potential of a third newbee before the president's term is up.
McCain Feingold will not stand.
To: defenderSD
Political speech gets the highest level of protection of all forms of speech. There is no way that this could survive a First Amendment challenge.
Screw the MSM, the horse they rode in on, and the monopoly on information that McCain is trying to give them. The MSM is NOT a constituency.
18
posted on
03/23/2006 7:41:34 PM PST
by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: defenderSD
19
posted on
03/23/2006 7:44:39 PM PST
by
kitkat
(Democrats: Millions for politics, but not one cent for national defense.)
To: defenderSD
It's time for the second amendment to protect the first, just as the founders planned.
20
posted on
03/23/2006 7:45:13 PM PST
by
hang 'em
(Nuke the Moose.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson