Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marine_Uncle
I am being a bit verbose to cover some bases as to why a single Iraqi secular government for all Iraq with minimal influence by the sectarian elements represent the best end goal.

Meaning the US needs a Saddam Hussein, Friendly Edition (tm). ;)

30 posted on 03/24/2006 9:07:10 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Jeeves
" Meaning the US needs a Saddam Hussein, Friendly Edition (tm). ;)"
No. A fully democratized willing secular ran government composed of a mix of ethnic/religious/secular people who will represent all Iraqis. Saddam was a dictator. His government turned from it's early days into a organization only to please the dictator. So I understand where you where coming from, which is OK. But we should be carefull in how we define what type of government could best serve all Iraqi's and at the same time slowly help bring positive change to the ME.
32 posted on 03/24/2006 9:37:43 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson