To: Marine_Uncle
I am being a bit verbose to cover some bases as to why a single Iraqi secular government for all Iraq with minimal influence by the sectarian elements represent the best end goal. Meaning the US needs a Saddam Hussein, Friendly Edition (tm). ;)
30 posted on
03/24/2006 9:07:10 PM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Mr. Jeeves
" Meaning the US needs a Saddam Hussein, Friendly Edition (tm). ;)"
No. A fully democratized willing secular ran government composed of a mix of ethnic/religious/secular people who will represent all Iraqis. Saddam was a dictator. His government turned from it's early days into a organization only to please the dictator. So I understand where you where coming from, which is OK. But we should be carefull in how we define what type of government could best serve all Iraqi's and at the same time slowly help bring positive change to the ME.
32 posted on
03/24/2006 9:37:43 PM PST by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson