Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unfortunately a bluestater
I acknowledge that I know nothing about port security, but I am still concerned about contracting out important security operations that are supposed to protect the US to foreign countries, especially foreign countries that we do not have long-term, friendly relationships with. Also, do we really want China or the Philippines to have access to this "sophisticated U.S. radiation detector"?

That radiation detector is not a US invention. It is new of the US. It allows 140 container scans a hr. US port scanners allow only 20. DPW would have been the first to put these scanners in US ports. DPW has them in all their port operations. The union opposes the new scanners. Most all European ports already have the scanners.

127 posted on 03/24/2006 12:01:09 PM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: jec41

Thanks for the info. Figures the union would oppose them.


142 posted on 03/26/2006 12:31:47 AM PST by unfortunately a bluestater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson