Skip to comments.
Why Arnold is Losing the Republicans
FlashReport ^
| 03-23-06
| Bruce Biolosky
Posted on 03/23/2006 1:10:31 PM PST by Amerigomag
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Bruce L. Bialosky; Former Chair, Golden Circle of the California Republican Party. Bruce has been involved with helping to raise funds up in LA for Republican candidates and causes for years.
Another steamed, highly partisan, Republican workhorse.
To: Amerigomag
Although not a Californian, I am coming to the view that he should be outcast.
I hope he does something to change my mind, but if this is what the GOP will settle for as the face of Ca republican, then they might as well be NY.
A lost cause.
2
posted on
03/23/2006 1:19:29 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Amerigomag
I thought California Republicans just liked to lose. They are soooooo good at it.
3
posted on
03/23/2006 1:19:34 PM PST
by
jim_trent
To: Amerigomag
Why is anyone surprised at this? When anyone dared to say that this is exactly what could be expected out of the Hollywood/Kennedy branch of the GOP they were hooted at and shouted down and told that we didn't know what we were talking about and that any Republican with half a brain was behind Ahnold. Tom Mcclintock was called a stooge, an extremist and a spoiler and his supporters were called worse.
Now they're starting to make the same kind os arguements for a Guilliani candidacy in 2008. Yeah...right!
4
posted on
03/23/2006 1:21:44 PM PST
by
pgkdan
To: All
The Republican base has been pleading with Wilson to change course. They have asked Wilson to remember core Republican values. They sent Wilson a sharp message last November when he refused to relent. But still, Wilson won't listen.
Wilson is not going to change. Pleading and threatening are not going to cause him to change course. Wilson hasn't liked conservatives and conservative values since he entered politics.
Schwarzenegger may well be reelected, but probably by independents and Democrats. The Wilsonegger gang has burned their bridges with most Republicans and they deserve what they worked so selfishly to earn.
To: Amerigomag
I supported Arnold from day one.
Now, I want him out.
Let the Democrats ruin California. I will be voting against Arnold. The Judges were the last straw.
6
posted on
03/23/2006 1:50:42 PM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache, so don't be hatin'. LOL!)
To: All
When we take a close look at The Terminator in both "word and deed", it seems to me that there is a remarkable similarity to the transparent professional ineptness of the late governor of Minnesota -- one Jesse Ventura!
All hype and blather, but no real "there, there" when it comes to exercise of sound management and effective "realpolitik".
7
posted on
03/23/2006 1:55:04 PM PST
by
dk/coro
To: Amerigomag
Call them names. That's a great way to gain their support.
wild-eyed, right-wing conservatives
8
posted on
03/23/2006 2:16:05 PM PST
by
DManA
To: Amerigomag
Because he's not one and keeps saying he is?
L
9
posted on
03/23/2006 2:52:11 PM PST
by
Lurker
(I trust in God. Everyone else shows me their hands.)
To: jim_trent
Yup, we California Republicans got nothing on the Democrats in the national scene. We just keep whining about what the other side is doing, then when someone on our side proposes an alternative, he/she gets shouted down... by BOTH sides of the aisle.
Go figure...
10
posted on
03/23/2006 2:54:02 PM PST
by
ssaftler
(Politically Correct isn't! Progressives aren't!)
To: Amerigomag
I was born there, but I don't live there anymore. It saddens me what has happened to what was once "the Golden State." California faces a fiscal debacle and it might as well happen under a Dim governor as under a RINO.
To: Amerigomag
The most important appointments Arnold makes are judgeships. Out of 121 judgeships, he has appointed 61 Republicans. In his wildest dreams does he really believe that a Democrat would be that evenhanded? The author is right. The reason is that Democrats understand that politics is an ideological battle. Republicans do not understand this. They believe that ideology doesn't matter, because some of them (like Arnold) have no strong beliefs on much of anything.
To: Pukin Dog
The Judges were the last straw. At first I thought maybe they were just moderate dems. But no--he even added a public defender who serves as defense counsel to the Hague, representing defendants accused of war crimes in the former Yugoslavia. From Flash Report:
I'm curious how Judge Snodgrass would have defended Milosevic. Last Year, she claimed that her client, charged with raping and strangling a 9-year old girl, had instead merely found the girl's dead body and then had sex with it -- the old "my client isn't a murderer, just a pedophile necrophiliac" defense. It didn't work.
Meet
Teresa Snodgrass.
To: Amerigomag
Back in Sept. of '03, I posted this:
"I've yet to see a conservative who has written that he or she feels that Arnold is genuinely the better candidate, just that he is the surest bet to win.
I've waited with an open mind, listened to Arnold's pitches, viewed the debate, and let the whole thing perk around in my mind. I wanted to like him and his agenda, I really did.
But, I come to the inevitable conclusion today that I cannot vote for Arnold. His policies don't add up. He cannot support and fund the things he wants and cut the budget at the same time, not with a Dem controlled legislature. He'll have to compromise too much, and I'll get stuck with the bill. And Arnie's "socially liberal" policies besides.
DFU says he agrees with McClintock at 95%, and Arnie at 70%. Running the tally, my Arnie meter hits 40%, tops. With that, my chad gets punched for Tom. There I stand, I can do no other."
Today, I don't reget my words or vote in the least. It appears that I was prophetic in my estimation of Arnold's policies. Can those who rushed to assure me that Arnie was the Great Leader of the California Republican Renaissance say the same?
14
posted on
03/23/2006 3:06:50 PM PST
by
LexBaird
("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
To: Amerigomag
Answer: Because he's actually a Lefty Kennedy!
15
posted on
03/23/2006 3:09:11 PM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: LexBaird
DFU says he agrees with McClintock at 95%, and Arnie at 70%. Reagan's threshold was 75%.
The three blind mice, who are constantly spamming this forum with pro Arnold infomercials, apparently have no threshold. Whatever Schwarzenegger does is ALWAYS better than what the Democrat flavor of the month might do if their Terminator is terminated.
To: doug from upland
courtesy ping. Old post being discussed.
17
posted on
03/23/2006 4:28:20 PM PST
by
LexBaird
("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
To: Amerigomag
I'm not happy with the gov, but want to point out that except for one law (the .50 caliber ban), he has prevented any more gun control from being enacted. A Dem. governor would have likely signed any and all gun control bills crossing his desk. BTW, both Serbu & Barret firearms have introduced long-range rifles specifically designed to work around the .50 ban, so that particular law is almost moot.
18
posted on
03/23/2006 4:29:28 PM PST
by
jrp
To: jrp
he has prevented any more gun control from being enacted. Please remind me of the legislation he has vetoed.
I've only found these two on a quick check:
AB 754
Author: Dave Jones (D)
Title: Firearms: Rewords and reorganizes Penal Code
Status: Vetoed by Governor
AB 996
Author: Mark Ridley-Thomas (D)
Title: Sales Storage of Ammunition
Status: Vetoed by Governor
But he did sign this one:
SB 48
Author: Jack Scott (D)
Title: Selling ammunition to underage person
Status: Signed by Governor
Which limits ammunition sales to those over 18.
What did I miss?
To: jim_trent
"I thought California Republicans just liked to lose. They are soooooo good at it."And just what is it that makes you an expert on California Republicans?
20
posted on
03/23/2006 5:40:04 PM PST
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson