Personal attacks get you nowhere other than minority status and the backbench. You've made my point for me quite well.
Arguing with Freepers is hardly "advancing the conservative movement." It's called infighting. Like any movement, infighting divides, it doesn't conquer. By definition, expansive movements must EXPAND their audience, not whittle it down.
And, for the record, 1000s of meaningless posts really are a net negative for the forum. That's not aimed at you, as I noted you actually seem to engage in discussion. Far too many "regulars" on this forum flood the servers with nonsense. Jim has been concerned about this for years now. As a longtime FR, if you were to be honest you'd have to agree that the content of the discourse here has dwindled. "Serious debates on FR?" Ah. Surely you jest. I'd rather expend energy affecting the lost, not pissing off fellow conservatives. Which leads back to Maples' unanswered questions.
Are you really Pat Buchanan, Reagan Man? Perhaps I'll cull that out by asking how you feel about Jews. Any thoughts on them?
You are very right. I don't know you. I do know your posts are just a bit overaggressive and antagonistic for someone claiming others are so ignorant.
>>>>Are you really Pat Buchanan, Reagan Man? Perhaps I'll cull that out by asking how you feel about Jews. Any thoughts on them?
Not only are you an ignorant juvenile, you're an arrogant race baiter, too boot. Carry on.