To: steel_resolve
How do the police know for a fact that they are drunk? Are they coercing people to take a breathalizer? Are people who are not driving threatened with loss of liscense if they don't submit to a breathalizer?
40 posted on
03/23/2006 8:41:51 AM PST by
massgopguy
(massgopguy)
To: massgopguy
No breathalyzer needed for PI charge, just the opinion of the arresting officer.
46 posted on
03/23/2006 8:44:48 AM PST by
eastforker
(Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
To: massgopguy
How do the police know for a fact that they are drunk? Are they coercing people to take a breathalizer? Are people who are not driving threatened with loss of liscense if they don't submit to a breathalizer? Actually I was told by someone that got busted in the scam that more than 3 or more beers was suppose to be the way they knew. Of course, I was on beer 5 or 6 when I was told this so I may not remember the details correctly.
57 posted on
03/23/2006 8:51:01 AM PST by
Hang'emAll
(WE WILL NOT DISARM!!!)
To: massgopguy
excellent point. I would refuse, let them arrest me and then hire a lawyer.
58 posted on
03/23/2006 8:51:28 AM PST by
steel_resolve
(An intolerant culture will seek to impose it's will on the tolerant one.)
To: massgopguy
59 posted on
03/23/2006 8:51:52 AM PST by
Millee
(Don't make me get out my voodoo doll out!)
To: massgopguy
There is no objective standard for public intoxication as there is for DWI; the sole arbiter of "drunk" is the arresting officer.
108 posted on
03/23/2006 9:15:24 AM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson