Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China blasts U.S. over trade protectionism
Globe and Mail ^ | 23/03/06 | BARRIE MCKENNA

Posted on 03/23/2006 3:57:28 AM PST by John Filson

-- Beijing politely rolled out the red carpet this week as two leading U.S. senators began a fact-finding mission to determine how to punish China for manipulating its currency. But half a world away in Geneva, China's delegate to the World Trade Organization lobbed a rhetorical bomb at the United States, accusing Washington of hyping national security concerns to restrict foreign investment on its home turf.

"By interpreting and applying WTO national security clauses in an excessive way, [the United States] has again seriously undermined the credibility of the multilateral trade regime, over which China is highly concerned," Chinese WTO envoy Sun Zhenyu told his fellow ambassadors yesterday.

The comments appeared to be directed at U.S. political backlash that helped kill a bid last year by China's CNOOC Ltd. to acquire Unocal Corp., a Houston-based U.S. oil and gas producer.

"Recently the United States exerted pressure and imposed restrictions on inward [foreign direct investment] on account of national security, which prevent foreign companies from seeking mergers and acquisitions [there]," Mr. Sun added.

The verbal attack, which coincides with the release of a WTO report on U.S. trade policy, marks the latest flashpoint of an increasingly strained relationship between the two economic and military giants.

China wasn't alone in warning about rising protectionist tendencies in the United States. In comments filed yesterday with the WTO, the European Union urged the United States to strike "a better balance" between security concerns and avoiding "unnecessary and costly burdens" to legitimate business.

Responding to the criticism, U.S. Trade Representative Rob Portman said the Bush administration is "cognizant of the potential for protectionism in the U.S. and we are actively communicating the real world benefits of trade at home." But he pointed out that United States hardly has a monopoly on anti-trade tactics.

"Economic isolationism . . . is not just a phenomenon in the United States," Mr. Portman said in a statement released in Washington.

The recent furor over the proposed takeover of several East Coast ports by Dubai Ports World of the United Arab Emirates has caused concern that the United States may be turning increasingly inward as it wages a global war on terrorism.

In the United States, critics blame China for stealing U.S. jobs and pushing the trade deficit to record levels by keeping the value of its currency, the yuan, artificially low. Last July, China raised the value of the yuan by 2.1 per cent and introduced a system to gradually move the currency away from its peg to the U.S. dollar. But the currency has barely moved since.

In Beijing, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said the next couple of months could be a defining period in U.S.-China relations.

"Our goal is to let the Chinese government realize that the politics of this issue is about to get out of hand," warned Mr. Graham, co-author of a bill with Democrat Charles Schumer that would slap a 27.5-per-cent tariff on all Chinese imports. He said the senators are stressing to leaders in Beijing that "if you think the relations between our two countries are good, you're misreading the tea leaves back home [in the U.S.]. They're not good, and they're getting worse."

Mr. Graham and Mr. Schumer have said they want to push for a vote on the widely popular legislation as early as this month. The senators were slated to meet yesterday with Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the People's Bank of China.

The Congressional vote could be the first dust-up in the prelude to next month's U.S. visit by Chinese President Hu Jintao. The White House confirmed yesterday that Mr. Hu would meet U.S. President George W. Bush on April 20.

That's just five days after the U.S. Treasury Department is slated to release a report on whether to officially brand China a currency manipulator -- the first step in imposing sanctions.

Although largely drowned out by the politicians, U.S. business leaders have appealed for calm in the escalating dispute. Caterpillar Inc. chairman Jim Owens warned Congress not to be seduced by tariffs and other retaliatory measures against the Chinese.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; freetrade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last
To: carl in alaska
Higher productivity is of course good, but when we run a $200 billion trade deficit with China that shifts jobs to China from America.

Glad you like productivity growth. How many jobs get shifted for each billion of trade deficit.

They have to start buying more stuff from us (and paying for it...lol.)

Sounds good to me.

101 posted on 03/23/2006 10:12:44 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

Try 17%.


102 posted on 03/23/2006 10:16:10 AM PST by ghitma (Lifter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sgribbley

Interesting...hmmmm. Where can I find that news?


103 posted on 03/23/2006 10:17:27 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: sgribbley
I'm borrowing this from Willie who posted this today.

Here's the link: China to surpass U.S.

104 posted on 03/23/2006 10:18:23 AM PST by Willie Green (Throw the bums out!!! ............ALL OF THEM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned
Jec, you may have missed the VAT (tax) that EU (Briton and China have in you calc. the gov site lists ave tariffs for china at over 20% if I remember correctly

Thats on necessary items for one but not the other.

Ps I was with 101st which we then called the puking chickens 69-71 LOL.

64-68 You must have been a leg or were you airborne?

105 posted on 03/23/2006 10:18:45 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: sgribbley

Tony Blair also made a fairly hawkish speech last night (posted at FR.) That's probably a secondary factor.


106 posted on 03/23/2006 10:18:48 AM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
Futures contracts. It will reach 70 a barrel this year and decline some. Right now we have the largest reserves in years and they are building them higher. Something coming down the pike in the future or is expected.
107 posted on 03/23/2006 10:25:55 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: jec41
Leg, MP ,2 tours Hue AO. You most likely in Saigon AO with those dates..got down there a few times to LBJ (long bin jail) and on river patrol boats on Saigon river..long ago and under two President's who could not get the guts up to do what was right.
108 posted on 03/23/2006 10:29:53 AM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2006/pdf/hist.pdf


109 posted on 03/23/2006 10:35:02 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: John Filson

yes, yes let us make more trade concessions. after all our money will be staring back at us in the form of - chinese nukes. /sarc


110 posted on 03/23/2006 10:41:38 AM PST by The Lion Roars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jec41

"They do business only in the US?"

What we do is provide credit approval for other large credit card companies and I actually work under contract from another large computer company. I'm sure they do provide service overseas. I'm actually pro-free-trade if it's really free trade and not a scam on the American people to benefit multi-national corporations, politicians and bureaucrats. My allegiance is to my country not to my government or the corporation I work for. I would not put my fellow countrymen out of work to fatten my wallet. I'm not saying you do or would, this is just how I feel.


111 posted on 03/23/2006 10:46:40 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

"My allegiance is to my country not to my government or the corporation I work for. I would not put my fellow countrymen out of work to fatten my wallet. I'm not saying you do or would, this is just how I feel."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>................
well said, too many have misplaced the free market as an end above even loyalty to our Country and forgot our fellow citizens...


112 posted on 03/23/2006 10:51:15 AM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned
Bien Hoa 1967 I don't remember a lot. About 10 yrs are a blur. I got hurt, not in combat but on a jump. My son will be home from Iraq in 41 days. His third combat action. His service is much greater than mine.
113 posted on 03/23/2006 10:53:36 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

I can remember when it was strange to do business out of the county much less the state. What you could buy in the stores was usually protected goods. If not protected it cost you double. People will get use to it.


114 posted on 03/23/2006 11:00:38 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: jec41
That includes the right to free trade

There is no right to "free trade" in the Constitution. There is, however the authority to levy tariffs.
115 posted on 03/23/2006 11:02:59 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

"There is no right to "free trade" in the Constitution. There is, however the authority to levy tariffs."

However their is a claus to protect us from invasion, which by the way is being flagrantly violated by the "Free Trade" crowd also.


116 posted on 03/23/2006 11:19:34 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
There is no right to "free trade" in the Constitution. There is, however the authority to levy tariffs.

Yep its old as the Greeks. It was a big issue in the American Revolution and the Civil War. Too bad the Indians didn't have a Constitution with tariffs or they could have barred Columbus from America. However shortly after Spain administered tariffs for American ports owned by Spain including docking fees. You might also consider the 3/5 compromise.

117 posted on 03/23/2006 11:28:07 AM PST by jec41 (Screaming Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: jec41

"We win both selling and buying."

Free-traitor lie #999.

It is exceedingly difficult for a US interest to open a market in China due to red-tape and belligerence on the part of their government. Once they do, its' just a matter of time before China reverse engineers, and cuts into that company's global market-share. Our current trade relations with China amount to economic suicide. It also funds a fairly nasty socialist government and gives them increased influence over our affairs.


118 posted on 03/23/2006 12:43:35 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jec41

yep, Bien hoa airbase, landed there sept 69 1st two weeks in country. Thanks for both yours and your son's service..I wish him a safe return.


119 posted on 03/23/2006 12:51:04 PM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: jec41
Too bad the Indians didn't have a Constitution or they could have barred Columbus from America.

I am not sure how that would work. What is it you are trying to say?
120 posted on 03/23/2006 12:51:12 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson