[Norman Bates]

One night of payback in November 1992 got us 8 years of Clinton and the chance of die-hard conservative Dan Quayle to succeed President George Bush in '97 down the drain. And worse. If Clinton had been run-around in '92 (as he would've been) would we now be worrying about Hillary Clinton? Would anyone remember her after 14 years? Failed past presidential candidates' wives do not run successfully for President. People ought to remember what voting third party can do. Was it worth it?

[antceecee]

I hope everyone reads Norman Bate's post and considers their actions very carefully in the next election.

[Howlin]

Was it worth it?

Evidently some people think so.

[onyx]

You could not be more correct.
I have not forgotten and I didn't fall for Perot at all.

Third party votes help to elect the other side, be they democrat-off-shoot's like the greenies or GOP-off-shoots like Perot's and Losertarians and CP.

[Mo1]

People ought to remember what voting third party can do. Was it worth it?

Which is why we all need to make sure McPain never makes it out of the Primaries

[Old_Mil]

People ought to remember what voting third party can do. Was it worth it?

When it comes down to the difference between Hillary and McCain/Rudy/etc? Absolutely. By the way, Bush I lost to Clinton because he raised taxes. He had no one to blame but himself. Clinton was re-elected because the Republican party nominated a RINO's corpse to oppose him.