Replies

Kerry was on tape! Do you understand that? Solid proof!

Kerry's testimony before congress nailed him! For all to see!

McCain's superior OFFICERS supported him and those who are alive still support him.

Ronald Reagan liked McCain alot.

You are WRONG about his POW years!

Since you keep posting lies, I guess that makes you a liar.

I donated to the Swifties. Twice.

Show one lie I posted. I quoted his superior officers who were there in the camp with him. You can call them liars if you want but it is you who has the credibility problem.

You arbitrarily choose to believe one veteran over another. That’s fine but it shows you are a hypocrite at best.

Kerry is on tape comment to congress. McCain is on tape too, doing propaganda films for the enemy. He admitted in print giving military information for special medical care.

Show ONE LIE in my posts. Just one.

You have no facts on your side so have to resort to attacking those of us who do. Come up with one lie or stand exposed.

Why do you talk down to others all the time like they are idiots and say you are the only one that knows anything about McCain without producing a shred of evidence to prove your convictions?

Your Quote:

"McCain's superior OFFICERS supported him and those who are alive still support him."

End Quote.

Two of his superior officers may support him but you are so wrong when you state that others who are still alive also support him. Those I know most certainly do NOT support him and their claim is that those who do not support him far out number those that do.

As for saying his POW years have nothing to do with the coming election, again you're so wrong. His POW years and what he's had to say about that time is part of his character, a very important feature of the person who'll be elected as POTUS. You apparently are under the mistaken impression a leopard can change it's spots.

McCains years as a POW should be taken into consideration on an equal footing along with his history while a member of the Senate.

Haven't you given any thought to the reason he's a co-sponser to the censorship bill? You don't suppose it's because his guilty conscience is trying to stop any of his past discretions being made more public than they already are do you?