Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RHINO369
To have a polygamist society would insure the rich and well off males would have multiple wives, and the young men wouldn't have any

Like, for example, Larry King, Teddy Kennedy, Donald Trump, Kwisi Imfume, Jesse Jackson, or the legendary Wilt Chamberlain ....

Newsflash: Rich and well off males have as many women as they want, both licit and illicit. Not unless there are significantly more "rich" than exist today will it effect the availability of females in the overall population. The problem you anticipate comes from having an extremely limited population with nearly universal polygamy within to start with.

I say again, we already practice polygamy in the US, with all the attendant inheritance, social welfare and complex clan implications. It is socially sanctioned and commonplace. The only requirement is that we have our multiple spouses sequentially and not concurrently.

167 posted on 03/23/2006 11:01:44 AM PST by LexBaird ("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird

"Like, for example, Larry King, Teddy Kennedy, Donald Trump, Kwisi Imfume, Jesse Jackson, or the legendary Wilt Chamberlain ....

Newsflash: Rich and well off males have as many women as they want, both licit and illicit. Not unless there are significantly more "rich" than exist today will it effect the availability of females in the overall population. The problem you anticipate comes from having an extremely limited population with nearly universal polygamy within to start with."

True, but most of the women they get are temporary relationships. The little slut will go find a new man after the fling is over. Polygamy insures that a large percent of women will be with a small percent of the men perminatly. Its the knowledge that you will never get a wife that would cause most problems.

"I say again, we already practice polygamy in the US, with all the attendant inheritance, social welfare and complex clan implications. It is socially sanctioned and commonplace. The only requirement is that we have our multiple spouses sequentially and not concurrently."

Having multiple spouses sequentially is far different than concurrently. Under the immoral system we have now, most people pair off, even if its only for a short time. Under large scale Polygamy, most men will NEVER have a partner, and they know they won't. This is all speculation because polygamy only works when women are treated like property anyway. What percent of women would accept her man getting a new wife? The murder rate amoung women would certainly go up!


170 posted on 03/23/2006 11:19:29 AM PST by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson