[hosepipe]

The people that elected Saul Alinsky's student(Hillary) as a Senator plus Chuck Shumer, the Waddler, Rangle and other Moonbats and WILL ELECT EVEN MORE OF THEM.. have spoken..
-----------------------
Thank you for openly confessing your bizarre belief that being science-literate is incompatible with being a conservative... Countless liberals would heartily agree with you on that point, even though I don't.
--------------------------------------------------------

My dear Ichthy'osaurus;
True kinda, humans just love a good story.. some even love a bad story evidenced by Shakespeare's success.. or silly ones with a moral evidenced by Grimm's Fairly Tales.. or high, lofty and transcendent ones evidenced by the Bible.. Darwin was a story teller.. and Darwinic Shamans have added mightily to the Yarn and should be respected for the effort.. but its at its base My father the protein molecule(ultimate Darwin) is eclipsed by Humpty Dumpty..

The simplicity and depth of Humpty Dumpty a child or even Cosmologist can understand.. My father the protein molecule is so unprobable.. and probably statisitically impossible.. but an egg on a wall is quite believeable..

However New York City voters, you know, are quite insane... I wrote and programmed a NYC payroll once.. and can testify those people are NUTTIER THAN A MOONBAT.. They LOVE to be TAXED... They love it..

[Coyoteman]

and Darwinic Shamans have added mightily to the Yarn...

Your scorn does you little credit.

Do you actually know anything about, say these fossils, or are you getting all of your direction from religion and your education from creationist websites?

If the latter, at least enjoy the pretty pictures.

Figure 1.4.4. Fossil hominid skulls. Some of the figures have been modified for ease of comparison (only left-right mirroring or removal of a jawbone). (Images © 2000 Smithsonian Institution.)

(A) Pan troglodytes, chimpanzee, modern
(B) Australopithecus africanus, STS 5, 2.6 My
(C) Australopithecus africanus, STS 71, 2.5 My
(D) Homo habilis, KNM-ER 1813, 1.9 My
(E) Homo habilis, OH24, 1.8 My
(F) Homo rudolfensis, KNM-ER 1470, 1.8 My
(G) Homo erectus, Dmanisi cranium D2700, 1.75 My
(H) Homo ergaster (early H. erectus), KNM-ER 3733, 1.75 My
(I) Homo heidelbergensis, "Rhodesia man," 300,000 - 125,000 y
(J) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Ferrassie 1, 70,000 y
(K) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Chappelle-aux-Saints, 60,000 y
(L) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, Le Moustier, 45,000 y
(M) Homo sapiens sapiens, Cro-Magnon I, 30,000 y
(N) Homo sapiens sapiens, modern

[betty boop]

Thank you for openly confessing your bizarre belief that being science-literate is incompatible with being a conservative... Countless liberals would heartily agree with you on that point, even though I don't.

Hi hosepipe! The above is a totally tendentious remark, and rather pointless. I'd reply to the writer, but he doesn't want me to ping him anymore. But if you'd like to relay my opinion of what he said, I wouldn't mind.

What you wrote, hose, made perfect sense to me: "The people that elected Saul Alinsky's student (Hillary) ... plus Chuck Schumer ... Rangle and other Moonbats ... WILL ELECT EVEN MORE OF THEM," if given half a chance -- and the ability and willingness to lie, cheat, and steal.

Supposing their like-minded friends on the bench will bail them out if need be, and their friends in academe, in collusion with more friends in the MSM, will help them survive any challenge after the fact.

This is not idle speculation here, either: We've got plenty of history to look at for corroboration that this sort of thing can be done, and has been done. If you're a Left Progressive, you have to believe that it can be done again.

Why do you suppose our friend Ich seemingly fails to notice this?

I find your observation both astute and prescient. Thank you for sharing it with me.