[AnnoyedOne]

Now, an adult who knows how discussion works would retract their unsupportable claim, even though they might really want it to be true. A child would whine that the burden is on the rest of the world to prove them wrong, and that disbelieving the child's asinine claims is tantamount to burning ancient scrolls of scientific conjecture.

Look, simple as this, I am not gonna spend years writing a friggin book for you. Go to the library and educate youtself. Other than that.. a few hundred musical notes.. versus millions of millions of coded pieces of information in a dna strand. If your mind is incapable of grasping the enormity of the difference.. then that is a limitation of your mind, and if your mind IS that limited.. you would be incapable of understanding any evidence that was given to you anyway. I have little doubt that, given your apparent intellect, your lips are probably moving as you read this. As for it being tantamount to burning such scrolls, the parallel between you and I is that if I were one of those guys who proposed an Atom, 2400 yrs ago or so... you would have been saying "Don't write that down!" "We cannot prove it is true so it should therefore never be studied!" "We do not want our children learning this!" "Here drink this poison!". A real visionary you are... the sort that time tends to make a complete ass out of.

[aNYCguy]

Look, simple as this, I am not gonna spend years writing a friggin book for you... you would be incapable of understanding any evidence that was given to you anyway

You have an amazing number of ways of saying "I can't back up my wild-eyed claims."

Bottom line: You made a fantastic, and apparently untrue claim. Having been called on it, you are stamping your foot, taking every opportunity to compare yourself to the originators of atomic theory, and generally acting like a child. I won't bother to give you the benefit of the doubt next time; I'll assume your statements are indefensible.