A scientific hypothesis needs no proof. That is what makes it a hypothesis. When it can be tested, predictions made, and the results repeated, it then qualifies as scientific theory. Once again, some 24 centuries or so seperated the hypothesis of the Atom, and the ability to test it in any way.
I have stated a hypothesis, and I feel quite comfortable in the assertion that DNA is so much greater complexity.. but if you do not think so.. feel free to endeavor in science pursuit and disprove my hypothesis. I do not have to PROVE a scientific hypothesis. ;)
If you don't want to make any attempt to back up your silly mathematical claims, that's fine, but you'd be acting more adult if you retracted them when called on them.