Posted on 03/22/2006 6:19:41 PM PST by Coleus
New study confirms past research; youth often copy what they see on screen.
A study published in the March edition of the Journal of Adolescent Health found that kids who regularly view sexualized media are more likely to engage in sexual activity than those who are not exposed. In addition, such exposure can have just as much influence in a teen's life as parental relationships and religious beliefs. If family relationships are weak, media becomes a "sexual super peer."
Daniel Weiss, senior analyst for media and sexuality at Focus on the Family Action, said such studies confirm what common sense has said for years. "Ideas have consequences," he said. "The last few years have seen a growing body of evidence demonstrating the harm from sexually explicit media. The twisted portrayal of sexuality in mass media is fracturing and distorting our youth in very harmful ways."
Researchers interviewed more than 1,000 children between 12 and 15 years old, asking them to identify specific media — such as magazines, movies, television and music — they commonly viewed. Then they were asked to answer questions about their personal level of sexual activity. When researchers compared the level of sexual activity to the media the young people normally sought, a direct correlation was identified: The more exposure to sexual behavior, the more likely kids were to act on it in real life.
"The strong relationship between media and adolescents' sexual expression may be due to the media's role as an important source of sexual socialization for teenagers," the study said. "Adolescence is a developmental period that is characterized by intense information seeking, especially about adult roles. Adolescents may turn to the media for information about sexual norms."
Other studies have proven the same to be true. One comprehensive project by psychologist Rebecca Collins published in September 2004 in the online journal Pediatrics found that the more sex-oriented scenes kids viewed, the more likely they were to become sexually active. "It's social learning. 'Monkey see, monkey do,' " she said. "If everyone's talking about sex or having it, and something bad hardly ever comes out of it, because it doesn't on TV, then they think, 'Hey, the whole world's doing it, and I need to.' "
Dr. Bill Maier, vice president and psychologist in residence at Focus on the Family, said the results of studies like Collins' should be a wake-up call for parents. "The evidence is clear: Children who regularly view sexually suggestive media are more likely to engage in promiscuous sexual behavior themselves," he said. "What's particularly disturbing about this new research is that it shows that media messages about sex influence kids' attitudes and behaviors just as much, or more so, than their parents.
"Parents who don't understand the power of media or don't take steps to limit their child's exposure to sexually provocative material may very well face the heartbreak of an unplanned pregnancy or a sexually transmitted disease." Parents can't control everything their children see, but, according to Weiss, they can make a difference. "Parents' first task is to cultivate in their children a hunger for virtue and a desire to seek out what is good and beautiful," he said. "Parents can limit their children's exposure to sexually explicit messages through careful and wise media choices — and those constraints are helpful — but only internal restraints will protect a child outside the home."
FOR MORE INFORMATION
To view the abstract of the study in the Journal of Adolescent Health, visit the Web site.
Must read - pingify?
People who say that movies etc don't affect teenagers (or anyone) are fooling themselves.
If what we see and hear and focus our mind on had no effect on us, education and advertising would also have no effect.
Precisely.
The problem with viewing such garbage is that it takes an act that is supposed to be the ultimate, highest and most beautiful example of love between a husband and wife and turns it into something that is casual, done with just about anybody/thing and leaves no emotional consequences. Of COURSE seeing it portrayed this way time and time again has an effect; what the heck does the author expect?
If viewing this stuff doesn't effect people, then why do marketers spend millions advertising, eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.