Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KevinDavis
Any time I hear "You can't travel faster than light" I hear, "You can't travel faster than sound".
59 posted on 03/22/2006 6:47:34 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Psycho_Bunny

The question with whether an object could travel faster than sound was what would happen to air particles if that occurred: Could air move faster than it moves due to sound waves? The answer is that air gets spatially compressed, causing a sonic boom. It was not clear whether than spatial compression would destroy the craft doing the compression; as it turns out the compression happens in advance of the object.

A "photonic boom" would certainly be a concern if it were possible to travel than light. But the problem with surpassing the speed of light is one of relativity, not mechanics; since time of the stationary objects travels faster and faster relative to you, as your speed asymptotically approaches light speed, the time elapsed from the observer's reference point approaches infinity.


77 posted on 03/22/2006 7:29:45 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Psycho_Bunny
Any time I hear "You can't travel faster than light" I hear, "You can't travel faster than sound".

One big difference is that we knew some objects could go faster than sound, such as bullets. We just didn't know if a controllable and powerful enough airplane could do it.

AFAIK no one has measured or observed an object that has mass going faster than light.

126 posted on 03/23/2006 8:12:20 AM PST by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson